Skill UI

Simulates a highly structured, sequential peer-review process using multiple specialized AI agents (e.g., Skeptic, Constraint Guardian, User Advocate). This skill is designed to rigorously stress-test a design, surface hidden assumptions, identify potential failure modes, and enforce non-functional constraints before implementation. It transforms initial concepts into robust, validated specifications by simulating formal critique and achieving consensus via a mandatory Decision Log.

Structured manuscript and grant review guidance that walks reviewers through methodology, statistics, reporting compliance, and constructive feedback for rigorous scientific evaluation across disciplines.

This skill implements an autonomous, multi-round research review loop, simulating the rigorous peer-review process of top-tier conferences. It iteratively reviews, identifies weaknesses, suggests fixes, and re-reviews a research document using the MiniMax API. The system manages state persistence across multiple rounds, ensuring continuous improvement until a 'ready' assessment is achieved or the maximum round limit is reached. Ideal for academic writing, thesis refinement, or comprehensive project documentation.

Prepare and maintain venue-compliant rebuttals to external peer reviews. Parses reviewer feedback, ensures full issue coverage without fabrication, drafts safe text-only responses under character limits, and manages follow-up rounds for venues like ICML and OpenReview.

A specialized tool for searching published, peer-reviewed academic papers from major venues like IEEE, ACM, and Springer. Unlike preprint services (like arXiv), this skill provides verified citation counts, detailed venue metadata, and filtering options for finding established, high-impact research literature. Ideal for formal academic research and literature reviews.

Generates structured peer-review quality critiques of academic papers, covering summaries, methodology scrutiny, contribution evaluation, literature positioning, and recommendations across domains whenever a user requests reviews, analyses, or summaries of research publications.

Assists authorized reviewers in preparing evidence-bounded, constructive peer-review drafts and structured manuscript assessments. Supports reporting-guideline selection, claim–evidence checks, methods, statistics, reproducibility, and ethics critique.

Drafts self-assessments, peer reviews, and upward feedback using WorkIQ evidence from emails, meetings, and contributions. It helps you write honest, impact-focused performance reviews in your own voice with STAR-based structure.

Simulates a five-seat international journal peer review panel with dynamic reviewer personas covering journal fit, methodology, domain expertise, cross-disciplinary views and devil's advocacy. Supports full review, re-review verification, quick assessment, methodology focus and reviewer calibration.

This skill orchestrates the complete academic research workflow from initial exploration to final manuscript. It coordinates deep research, paper writing, and review processes into a seamless 10-stage pipeline. It manages transitions, tracks state, and ensures integrity through mandatory checks and peer reviews. Suitable for end-to-end paper generation and systematic research management.

This skill transforms a course syllabus (PDF, DOCX, etc.) into a highly curated, supplementary academic reading list. It parses topics and learning outcomes, calibrates content difficulty based on the target audience (undergraduate, graduate, etc.), and searches academic databases (Consensus) for recent, peer-reviewed papers. The output is a professional .docx file containing summaries, links, and advanced discussion questions, making it invaluable for educators and students needing structured, up-to-date course resources.

This skill transforms raw notes, bullet points, or unstructured memories into comprehensive, professional performance reviews. It structures the output for various review types (Self-assessment, Manager, Peer, 360 feedback), ensuring coverage of key achievements, core strengths, constructive areas for growth, and measurable development goals. Ideal for annual reviews, mid-year check-ins, and formal performance documentation.