Skill UI

A comprehensive guide for authors submitting papers related to web search, ranking, and data mining to WSDM. It provides critical advice on conference fit assessment, proper manuscript re-framing, required evidence (retrieval/ranking baselines, platform-aware evaluation), and how to position the work against competing top venues like SIGIR and KDD.

A comprehensive guide for authors submitting data mining papers to the ACM SIGKDD Conference. It helps authors assess the manuscript's fit, reframe the contribution (e.g., from journal to conference style), and strengthens the evidence bar by focusing on novelty, scale, reproducibility, and clear real-world impact required by top-tier data science venues.

A comprehensive guide for writing and verifying the institutional and accounting standard background section in academic manuscripts. This tool emphasizes the critical need for precision, requiring accurate standard names, official document numbers (文号), effective dates, and applicable scopes. Essential for empirical studies relying on regulatory changes, ensuring the manuscript meets the high standards of authoritative accounting journals.

This comprehensive guide details the methodological requirements for building a robust robustness section in accounting and empirical research manuscripts. It covers four critical pillars: substituting accounting measures, controlling for institutional/governance variables, executing placebo tests, and advanced endogeneity follow-ups. It helps authors ensure their primary findings withstand stringent academic scrutiny.

A comprehensive guide for authors preparing empirical research manuscripts (especially in accounting). It details best practices for structuring main tables (keeping them lean), transforming statistical coefficients into interpretable economic magnitudes, and properly visualizing dynamic effects using event study graphs. It emphasizes moving beyond simple significance stars to provide deep academic context.

This skill serves as a comprehensive guide for authors submitting manuscripts to highly selective pure mathematics journals like Acta Mathematica. It assesses the work's significance, intellectual fit, required level of rigor, structural integrity, and adherence to top-tier academic standards, ensuring the research is ready for the global mathematical research community.

This skill guides authors through the rigorous requirements of American Economic Journal: Economic Policy. It helps evaluate whether an applied economics manuscript meets the journal's high bar, focusing specifically on the joint criteria of sound causal identification (DiD, IV, RDD) and clear, impactful policy relevance. Use it to re-frame arguments and check against best practices for policy evaluation.

This guide provides a comprehensive, advanced strategy for academic researchers writing microeconometric papers for top-tier journals (e.g., AEJ: Applied). It teaches authors how to anticipate sophisticated, technical objections from expert referees (such as issues with causal inference design, selection bias, or parallel trends). The focus is on pre-empting these objections by integrating solutions directly into the manuscript text, rather than waiting for a formal revision letter.

This guide outlines the mandatory steps and components required to assemble a robust, reproducible data and code replication package for submissions to the American Economic Journal: Applied Economics (AEJ: Applied). It ensures compliance with the stringent AEA Data and Code Availability Policy, covering data provenance, master scripts, and version control. This package must be built iteratively, not at the acceptance stage.

This guide provides a rigorous framework for strengthening economic manuscripts submitted to top journals, such as AEJ: Micro. It details how to systematically test the robustness of main results through theoretical extensions (e.g., relaxing assumptions, perturbations) and applied/experimental methods (e.g., sensitivity analyses, placebo tests). Learn how to identify extensions that truly 'earn their place' and significantly enhance the overall academic contribution of your work.

This guide provides stringent methodological standards for establishing credible causal claims in empirical policy manuscripts. It covers advanced econometric techniques—including Difference-in-Differences (DiD), Instrumental Variables (IV), Regression Discontinuity Design (RDD), and Randomized Controlled Trials (RCT)—required to move beyond mere correlation and prove that the observed effect is genuinely caused by the policy intervention.

A comprehensive strategy guide for authors submitting policy-evaluation papers to top economics journals. It details how expert referees evaluate manuscripts, focusing on four critical areas: policy interest, causal credibility, welfare reading, and robustness. This tool helps authors proactively anticipate and strengthen potential weaknesses before submission or during revision, significantly increasing the paper's chances of acceptance.