Skill UI

A comprehensive guide for authors submitting academic papers, detailing how to proactively provide reproducible code, datasets, and experimental scripts. This ensures that research results are verifiable and trustworthy, significantly enhancing the credibility of findings in high-tier journals despite the absence of formal artifact evaluation badges.

This guide details the best practices for preparing and submitting supplementary materials for CSCW submissions. It clarifies the difference between main papers, appendices, and separate files, emphasizing that anything needed to *trust* the method belongs here. Crucially, it provides deep guidelines on data anonymization, metadata scrubbing, and version control for review rounds.

This guide details best practices for enhancing the credibility of academic manuscripts submitted to scholarly journals, particularly addressing code and data availability. It teaches authors how to proactively provide stable links, checksums, comprehensive reproducibility scripts, and clear licensing statements. The focus is on bolstering trustworthiness for single-blind review processes, even when the journal does not mandate formal artifact badges.

A comprehensive guide for researchers designing and auditing empirical evaluations for data mining papers (e.g., ICDM). It teaches how to structure a trustworthy evaluation by defining operational tasks, conducting ablation studies to isolate mechanisms, proving scalability, and implementing known-truth checks to ensure findings are valid and not mere artifacts.

This comprehensive guide assists users in analyzing and reporting data for high-impact academic journals, specifically following the rigorous standards of the Journal of Consumer Research (JCR). It covers advanced statistical process evidence (mediation, moderation, effect sizes) for behavioral experiments, as well as methods for establishing trustworthiness in interpretive (CCT) research. It emphasizes transparency, replication code, and adherence to modern research reporting mandates.

Provides comprehensive guidelines for meeting modern academic publishing standards, particularly those required by educational psychology journals. It outlines mandatory requirements for ensuring research reproducibility, including depositing data, materials, and analysis code in trusted repositories with persistent identifiers (DOIs), adhering to JARS reporting standards, and documenting preregistration status.

This guide provides comprehensive standards for defending rigorous data analysis in academic submissions, particularly for the Journal of Management Studies (JMS). It details specific requirements for both quantitative work (e.g., robustness checks, SEM, endogeneity) and qualitative work (e.g., coding transparency, abductive logic, trustworthiness), ensuring the analysis credibly supports the theoretical claims.

This guide outlines the rigorous open science and transparency requirements for submissions to the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (JPSP). It details compliance with APA's TOP Guidelines at Level 2, mandating the proper disclosure of data, analysis code, and materials in a trusted repository. It also covers JARS reporting standards and guides authors on stating the preregistration status, ensuring research reproducibility.

This guide provides best practices for ensuring the scientific rigor and reproducibility of data mining and machine learning research published at top-tier conferences like KDD. It details a three-tier honesty model (Rerunnable, Rebuildable, Attested) and provides comprehensive checklists for disclosing pipeline stages, handling stochasticity, and documenting configurations to build reader trust.

A comprehensive guide for qualitative theory-building, covering multi-case comparison, grounded theory, and advanced methodological rigor. Learn how to structure your study by defining case selection logic, conducting multi-level coding (open, axial, selective), ensuring theoretical saturation, and establishing trustworthiness through triangulation, member checking, and audit trails. Ideal for papers built inductively from interviews or archives.

This guide provides comprehensive standards for analyzing and reporting results in Organization Science, a field characterized by diverse methodologies. It ensures methodological rigor and transparency whether the work is qualitative (establishing trustworthiness), quantitative (matching estimators to design), computational (reporting seeds and sensitivity), or formal/analytical. It emphasizes full reproducibility and mechanism-based inference.

This guide outlines comprehensive best practices for ensuring the reproducibility of Machine Learning and Pattern Recognition research. It covers fixing random seeds, locking hardware/software dependencies (Python, CUDA, etc.), managing data splits, tracking pre-trained model versions, and structuring the required artifact package for external review. It is essential for building trust in published scientific results.