Skill UI

A comprehensive skill guide designed to help researchers assess the suitability of their economics manuscripts for submission to 《Economic Review》. It covers journal positioning, required empirical rigor, structural expectations (abstract, citation style), common rejection pitfalls, and advice on necessary revisions and alternative journals. This tool is crucial for navigating academic publishing standards in Chinese economics.

Provides a comprehensive, structured strategy for authors responding to referee reports and revising highly technical econometric manuscripts for submission to top-tier journals like The Econometrics Journal (EctJ). It guides authors on differentiating between validity-critical, applied-value-critical, and compression-risk issues, ensuring the response is rigorous, concise, and systematically addresses all methodological and empirical gaps.

This comprehensive guide helps researchers audit their papers before submission to the EDBT conference. It covers critical steps including selecting the correct submission cycle and paper shape (Regular, Vision, Experiments & Analysis), adhering to strict formatting standards, managing the 12-month resubmission ban, ensuring double-blind compliance, and providing verifiable, reproducible artifacts. It is essential for academic publishing compliance.

A comprehensive project management guide for submitting database systems papers to EDBT. It details the complexities of the multiple-cycle rolling publication model, covering everything from initial evidence lock and cycle selection to the five-step review arc (Submission, Author Feedback, Revision, etc.). Use this to backward-plan your research timeline and manage the entire academic publishing process.

A comprehensive guide for structuring academic empirical research projects to ensure the full reproducibility of findings. This methodology covers standard folder layouts, master scripting, data provenance documentation, and best practices required for passing rigorous peer review scrutiny, thereby preventing data loss and calculation errors during revisions.

A comprehensive guide modeling the specific, single-round, double-anonymous review pipeline for IEEE ICSME submissions. It details the crucial early-decision cut (Accept, Reject, Response Recommended) and emphasizes that unlike journal submissions, there are no Major Revision rounds. Use this to strategically plan your research submission and response artifact.

A comprehensive guide for authors submitting manuscripts to IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging (TMI). It details the journal's specific scope, required technical rigor, necessary validation standards, and structure, emphasizing that contributions must be medical-imaging-specific rather than generic computer vision methods. This tool helps authors assess fit, re-frame their work, and anticipate submission requirements.

A comprehensive guide for authors revising manuscripts for the Journal of Accounting and Economics (JAE). It details how to structure the point-by-point response letter, emphasizing the critical need to address the editor's concerns and incorporate robust empirical evidence (identification, mechanism, and alternative tests) to satisfy economics-trained reviewers.

A comprehensive guide for authors handling a journal's revise-and-resubmit (R&R) decision. It outlines the critical sequence: prioritizing new analyses (identification, channel, measurement) over writing, triaging referee concerns (first-order vs. second-order), drafting evidence-backed responses, and updating the complete data-and-code package. Essential for quantitative researchers aiming for publication.

This guide details the rigorous and developmental peer review process of the Journal of Consumer Research (JCR). It covers the structure (double-anonymization, co-editor roles), reviewer expectations (conceptual contribution, evidence rigor, data transparency), and how to interpret decision letters (Reject vs. R&R). Use it before submission or when receiving a decision to structure your rebuttal and revision plan effectively.

A comprehensive guide for structuring responses to highly selective academic journal reviews, specifically for The Journal of Finance (JF) revise-and-resubmit manuscripts. It details how to prioritize the editor's central concerns over individual referee points, manage the revision process, utilize the Internet Appendix, and adhere to strict journal formatting and code-sharing guidelines.

Provides a structured guide for authors responding to review and revision (R&R) comments for top-tier finance journals like the Journal of Financial Intermediation (JFI). It teaches how to structure point-by-point rebuttals, address identification challenges (empirical and theoretical), and maintain a credible, evidence-based tone essential for single-blind academic review.