Skill UI

Create truthful, accessible, publication-ready scientific figures using Matplotlib, Seaborn, or Plotly. Ensures data integrity, proper encoding, accessibility compliance, and journal export planning for research publications. Includes guidelines for uncertainty displays, color/contrast review, and metadata validation.

Conduct comprehensive systematic literature reviews across biomedical and scientific domains using multiple academic databases. Synthesize findings, verify citations, and generate professional markdown or PDF documents. Includes AI-generated scientific schematics for visual enhancement. Ideal for research synthesis, meta-analyses, and thesis writing.

Transform raw structured data (CSV, Excel, JSON) into professional, long-form, interactive visualization reports. This tool generates comprehensive business review pages featuring KPI dashboards, multiple dynamic charts (using Chart.js/ECharts), detailed data tables, and narrative business insights, making it ideal for weekly or monthly performance reporting.

A comprehensive guide for assembling a fully reproducible research package for macroeconomics papers targeting the American Economic Journal (AEJ: Macro). It ensures compliance with the AEA Data and Code Availability Policy by documenting raw data, simulation/calibration code, estimation routines, and visualization steps, guaranteeing that results can be independently verified by reviewers.

A comprehensive guide for preparing academic exhibits (tables, figures, appendices) for the American Journal of Sociology (AJS). This skill ensures strict compliance with journal house conventions, covering consecutive numbering, lettered appendices, mandatory alt text, and proper post-text placement. It helps authors structure their arguments visually and pass through rigorous peer review and production stages.

A comprehensive guide for authors submitting to the American Political Science Review (APSR). It outlines best practices for creating self-contained, accessible, and statistically rigorous tables and figures. The resource emphasizes principles like maintaining word-count compliance, ensuring reproducibility, and presenting complex results (like treatment effects) using appropriate visualizations.

A comprehensive guide for creating rigorous, self-contained, and scientifically accurate tables and figures for academic manuscripts, particularly in the field of criminology. It details best practices for visualizing complex statistical results, including age-crime curves, trajectory plots, survival analyses, and spatial hot-spot maps. The focus is on ensuring evidence is clear, reproducible, and communicates the research findings effectively to expert reviewers.

A comprehensive guide for positioning visualization and visual analytics manuscripts for the IEEE Pacific Visualization Symposium (PacificVis). This skill helps authors refine their scope, evidence presentation, and overall narrative to match the unique requirements and review expectations of this top-tier conference. It acts as a fit/framing tool for conference submission strategy, ensuring the work is appropriately targeted for the Asia-Pacific community focus.

A comprehensive guide for structuring research papers, particularly in computer graphics and visualization fields (like SIGGRAPH). It dictates how to match technical claims (e.g., 'higher quality,' 'faster') to verifiable evidence, including head-to-head comparisons against State-of-the-Art (SOTA), detailed metric reporting (PSNR, SSIM, Hausdorff), performance timing linked to specific hardware, and robust user studies. Essential for achieving academic rigor and pre-empting domain reviewer objections.

A comprehensive guide for designing and auditing visualization experiments for high-stakes academic submissions (e.g., IEEE VIS). It details how to match evidence—such as controlled studies, power analyses, and benchmarks—to the specific type of claim (perceptual, algorithmic, system). Learn best practices for statistical rigor, CVD-safe encoding, and maintaining full provenance to ensure your findings are scientifically sound and trustworthy.