Skill UI

A powerful cognitive tool that moves beyond surface-level brainstorming. It forces users to systematically deconstruct complex problems down to their 'irreducible truths.' The skill identifies 8-12 hidden assumptions (Surface, Middle, Deep), classifies them (Fact, Convention, Belief, Interest-Driven), and ranks them by Fragility × Impact. This process allows users to stress-test their premises and rebuild conclusions based only on verified realities, making it invaluable for major life decisions or business hypothesis testing.

This comprehensive, guided 4-phase workflow helps teams establish clear identity, boundaries, and strategic positioning. It guides users through absorbing existing context, auditing current capabilities versus claimed responsibilities, articulating a defined mission, and finally achieving stakeholder alignment. Use this framework when starting a new role, inheriting ambiguity, or needing to define clear operational boundaries.

This mode acts as a structured thinking partner, guiding users through ambiguous problems, complex decisions, and open-ended strategy questions. Instead of providing direct answers, it focuses on challenging assumptions, asking clarifying questions, surfacing multiple perspectives (e.g., stakeholder views), and helping the user structure their thought process using advanced techniques like reframing, pre-mortem analysis, and identifying critical constraints. Ideal for product managers and leaders who need to explore ideas without a clear path forward.

This skill automates the complex process of resubmitting an already polished academic paper to a different conference or journal. It is designed for scenarios where the core content, experiments, and bibliography must remain untouched, but the paper needs micro-edits to accommodate new venue constraints, page limits, or prior reviewer feedback. It ensures the new submission is generated as a separate, sibling directory to maintain the integrity of prior submissions.

A meta-orchestrator designed for compliance teams to manage complex, multi-jurisdictional compliance programs. It automatically selects applicable regulatory frameworks (e.g., ISO 27001, GDPR, EU AI Act, HIPAA), computes control overlap across standards, simulates mock audits, and consolidates evidence into a unified reuse map. Ideal for planning annual audits or achieving multi-certification.

A comprehensive intelligence tool designed for clinical researchers to navigate the complex NIH grant landscape. It utilizes a detailed 6-step intake process (covering research idea, career stage, and data status) to perform a multi-faceted positioning analysis. The system maps research to appropriate NIH institutes using RePORTER data and generates an editable Word document containing actionable mechanism recommendations, submission timelines, and strategic guidance for funding applications.

This powerful skill pauses deep technical discussions to conduct a comprehensive, multi-dimensional reassessment. It analyzes conceptual drift, identifies unverified assumptions, and detects potential cognitive biases (e.g., confirmation bias, sunk cost fallacy). Use it when the conversation is becoming overly detailed, or when a strategic check-in is needed to ensure the focus remains on the core objective and the correct problem is being solved.

This framework serves as a rigorous thought partner, designed to challenge underlying assumptions, separate raw evidence from interpretation, and ensure that all conclusions are fully defensible. It guides users to define clear decision goals, test counterfactuals, and calibrate claims strictly to the available data quality. Ideal for high-stakes projects where the cost of error is significant.

This tool helps you draft, rewrite, or condense professional emails with precise control over tone, length, and audience. Whether you are performing cold outreach, providing status updates, or handling escalations, it ensures your communication is clear, concise, and impactful. It guides the process from outlining key points to providing structured variants and QA checks.

This meta-skill orchestrates complex, multi-step job search workflows, moving beyond simple advice. It is designed for concrete tasks such as tailoring resumes to specific job descriptions (JDs), building complete application packs, preparing for named interviews, comparing multiple job roles, or maintaining an organized application tracker. It focuses on producing reviewable artifacts and never performs automatic applications.

This tool assists researchers in structuring academic papers by mapping specific claims across different sections (Introduction, Method, Results, Discussion) to required external citations (BibTeX keys). It enforces citation density rules and ensures the correct role alignment (e.g., background, comparison, limitation) before the actual drafting process, guaranteeing that every core claim is properly supported and distributed.

This advanced tool generates a comprehensive, five-section academic paper outline (Abstract, Introduction, Method, Results, Discussion). Given a research topic, preferred style, and curated reference sources, it crafts a detailed narrative backbone aiming for 6,500-8,000 words. It ensures that each section contains sufficient concrete substance, sub-topics, and specific findings, providing a robust foundation for authors to expand into a full, high-quality research manuscript.