Skill UI

This guide provides a rigorous framework for authors submitting to specialized environmental economics journals (like JEEM). It helps authors determine if their research core environmental or resource mechanisms, articulate clear welfare/policy stakes, and pass the field-specific scrutiny required to make a novel, high-impact contribution.

A comprehensive guide for structuring environmental economics manuscripts, specifically tailored for high-impact journals. It teaches authors how to maintain a 'welfare-economics prose' standard, ensuring the crucial link between the environmental problem, the economic mechanism, and the policy implication is clearly and authoritatively presented. This prevents the paper from sounding like advocacy while retaining scientific rigor.

This framework guides the creation of a structured, argumentative literature review, preventing the writing from becoming a mere annotated bibliography. By imposing a unifying taxonomy, model, or question sequence, the author transforms scattered research into a cohesive argument about the field. It helps define the 'spine' of the survey, identifies knowledge gaps, and reconciles apparent contradictions in existing literature.

This guide helps writers structure academic syntheses to maintain rigorous objectivity, ensuring that the work summarizes the full spectrum of competing views rather than advocating for a single position. It details how to properly 'steelman' opposing arguments, weigh evidence impartially, separate positive findings from normative policy judgment, and honestly disclose areas of uncertainty.

A guide on how to present highly convincing empirical evidence in academic writing, especially in economics, when regression tables or complex math are limited. This skill teaches readers to translate statistical findings into clear, impactful prose by focusing on magnitude in plain units, synthesizing the body of evidence, defining ranges of precision, and maintaining intellectual honesty.

This strategy guides the rigorous writing of theoretical economics papers, emulating the standards of a Journal of Economic Theory (JET). It ensures that all assumptions are explicit and load-bearing, results are cleanly stated theorems, and proofs have a visible, expert-verifiable architecture. Use this when submitting a high-level theoretical paper where credibility relies on minimizing assumptions and maximizing procedural transparency for expert review.

A comprehensive guide for authors submitting to health economics journals, focusing on pre-submission pre-mortem analysis. It teaches how to anticipate specific, expert-level critiques—such as selection bias, concurrent confounding, or econometric limitations—and proactively structure the manuscript to neutralize these objections before they are raised by reviewers.

This style guide helps authors structure and write manuscripts for health economics journals, specifically addressing the unique needs of specialist reviewers. It focuses on ensuring the policy relevance, the empirical contribution, and the institutional grounding of the research are immediately clear, particularly in the abstract and introduction.

Provides comprehensive guidelines on structuring and formatting academic exhibits (tables and figures) for international finance and macroeconomics submissions. It ensures that the main findings (headline coefficients) are immediately clear, adhering to best practices for cross-country panels, event studies, and heterogeneity displays.

This guide provides detailed instructions for polishing academic manuscripts intended for top-tier international finance journals. It teaches authors to adopt an empirical, direct, and policy-aware voice, structuring the introduction, abstract, and highlights to highlight the international question and quantifiable policy implications, ensuring appeal to both academics and central bank policy readers.

This guide helps academic researchers scope their research questions and determine the appropriate contribution type (empirical paper, meta-analysis, or systematic review) for top-tier general management journals. It teaches authors how to ensure their work has a broad, general-management theoretical contribution rather than being too niche, and how to strategically compare fit against competing academic journals.

This tool provides a systematic framework for formalizing complex management and business scenarios into a mathematically well-posed decision problem. It guides users through identifying the five critical elements: decision makers, decision variables, information structure, uncertainty sources, and objectives/constraints. This is essential for ensuring that subsequent models (optimization, game theory, etc.) are correctly structured and viable for rigorous research.