Skill UI

This guide details the rigorous process of selecting and structuring academic content for venues with extremely strict page limits, such as major computer science conferences. It teaches authors how to 'triage' material, classifying information into critical, supportive, or discardable categories, ensuring the core argument remains visible and complete even when traditional supplementary files are prohibited.

This guide details the demanding review standards of top-tier academic journals, focusing on the triple-anonymous, quality-only criteria. It helps researchers understand how submissions are evaluated against expert objections, ensuring manuscripts are structured to anticipate critiques and maximize acceptance chances before formal submission. It serves as a critical pre-submission stress-test.

This skill guides the architectural organization of complex academic papers, ensuring that the argument unfolds in the clearest possible order within strict word limits. It focuses on the roadmap, the sequence of premises, handling objections, and structuring the introduction and conclusion, rather than sentence-level prose. Use it when your argument is sound but the draft lacks structural clarity or wanders off-topic.

This skill refines complex philosophical prose, ensuring rigorous arguments are highly accessible and easy to follow for a broad academic readership. It focuses on maximizing clarity, achieving linguistic economy, and ensuring all technical concepts are accompanied by plain-language exposition. Ideal for final drafting passes, improving readability, and adhering to strict word limits.

This guide helps authors structure their academic manuscripts for top-tier Information Systems journals (e.g., MISQ). It emphasizes moving beyond simple gap-spotting by requiring authors to explicitly join an established IS conversation, keep the IT artifact central to the theory, and clearly differentiate the contribution from parent disciplines and adjacent venues.

A comprehensive guide for authors responding to major or minor revisions from top-tier academic journals like MIS Quarterly. This skill teaches how to structure an auditable, point-by-point rebuttal letter, systematically addressing reviewer concerns, enhancing methodological rigor (e.g., common-method bias, identification), updating transparency materials, and adhering to strict formatting constraints.

A comprehensive preflight checklist for submitting manuscripts to high-tier academic journals. It verifies workflow compliance (e.g., ScholarOne), double-anonymity, adherence to strict page limits, preparation of the transparency commitment, and proper formatting (APA 7th). This guide ensures authors are fully prepared for the rigorous academic submission process.

This guide helps researchers structure and articulate strong theoretical contributions for top-tier MIS journals. It details how theory takes different forms—be it a causal behavioral mechanism, a design theory, or an economic model—depending on the specific MIS research tradition, ensuring hypotheses are derived a priori and the IT artifact is load-bearing.

This guide provides a detailed checklist and structural framework for polishing Marketing Science manuscripts. It emphasizes leading with clear business intuition over complex notation, adhering to INFORMS house style (citations, formatting, length), and ensuring the paper is submission-ready. Use this skill during the late-stage review process when the model and core arguments are finalized.

This comprehensive guide teaches authors how to structure and write professional rebuttals to reviewers' comments (R&R). It covers addressing complex critiques across theory contribution, advanced methodologies (e.g., HLM, CMV), measurement validity, and conflicting reviewer opinions. It ensures responses are highly specific, traceable, and academically rigorous.

This tool converts various academic citation formats (e.g., APA, Harvard) into the specific Vancouver/ICMJE numbered style required by the New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM). It ensures citations are numbered sequentially by appearance, handles limited author lists (first 6 + et al.), uses NLM abbreviations for journals, and performs a comprehensive evidence audit, ensuring the manuscript adheres to the strict standards of high-impact medical publishing.

A comprehensive guide for Earth scientists to determine if their research meets the broad, cross-disciplinary standards required by top-tier journals like Nature Geoscience. It helps authors assess if their findings represent a genuine Earth-system advance, possess broad interest, and are supported by quantified evidence, guiding them toward the optimal publication venue.