Skill UI

A comprehensive guide for authors preparing the supplementary material for multimedia conferences (e.g., ACM MM). It details how to structure the content, separating core arguments (Body) from supporting evidence (Supplement). Learn best practices for packaging videos, audio, and interactive demos, ensuring technical compatibility (H.264/MP4), maintaining anonymity for double-blind review, and creating a legible, reviewer-friendly submission index.

This guide teaches authors how to structure scientific manuscripts by correctly partitioning core findings, decisive evidence, and the main narrative into the body text, while moving exhaustive datasets, full protocols, and secondary characterization into the Supporting Information (SI). It ensures the main paper is stand-alone and convincing.

This guide provides best practices for organizing supplementary material and appendices in major conference submissions. It teaches authors how to maintain the core 11-page body's self-contained integrity while including necessary details (like full configurations, extended result grids, and full proofs) in appendices, ensuring the work remains robust even if reviewers do not read the supplemental content.

This guide provides a detailed framework for authors to strategically place content within technical conference papers. It outlines the distinct roles of the extended abstract, main body, appendix, and artifact, ensuring that all acceptance-critical information is positioned where reviewers are required to read it. Following these rules maximizes the paper's chances of successful peer review acceptance.

A comprehensive guide for authors submitting scientific papers to major conferences. It details the strategic placement of supplementary material across the main body, in-PDF appendices, and external anonymous artifacts. Learn how to maximize impact and provide necessary evidence while strictly adhering to page limits and respecting reviewer attention economics.

This guide provides best practices for structuring complex academic manuscripts, particularly for conferences requiring a single-PDF submission model. It details how to optimally split content between the limited body (e.g., 12 pages) and the extensive appendix, ensuring that the crucial theorems, proofs, and auxiliary lemmas are presented in a verifiable and highly readable manner for peer reviewers. Key techniques include implementing restatement discipline and writing roadmap paragraphs for clear verification paths.

This guide outlines the strategic allocation of content—such as results, methods, and limitations—into the main body, appendix, or artifact for academic submissions. The core principle is 'decision-criticality': any information a reviewer must read to accept the paper must reside in the main body, ensuring key findings are not hidden in supplementary materials or repositories.

A comprehensive guide for authors submitting to major AI conferences (like ECAI). It teaches the critical skill of separating core, decision-critical arguments (must be in the main body) from supporting details, proofs, and code (which belong in the optional supplement). This ensures reviewers can fairly judge the contribution despite strict page limits.

A comprehensive guide for authors responding to peer review and editorial board reports for top-tier academic journals. It covers the correct revision sequencing (manuscript first, then letter), structures for point-by-point replies, strategies for accepting, partially accepting, or rebutting reviewer comments, and deciding the optimal placement of supplementary analysis (body vs. appendix).

A comprehensive guide for authors submitting to FAccT, detailing the mandatory separation of content into three zones: the main Body, the Endmatter statements (including Ethics and AI Usage), and the Appendix/Supplementary material. It outlines strict rules regarding anonymity, page limits, and ensuring the core argument is decision-critical and visible from the main reviewed pages.

This guide provides structural best practices for writing highly technical academic papers, particularly for top-tier conferences. It teaches authors how to critically distinguish between the core material that must be visible in the main body (for the referee to follow and judge) and the auxiliary details, complete proofs, or routine calculations that can be safely deferred to an appendix. Following this structure prevents common writing pitfalls, such as 'hollow bodies,' ensuring the paper is both highly readable and technically rigorous.

This guide provides strict guidelines for structuring technical conference papers, especially when supplementary proofs are required. It emphasizes the critical rule that the main body (typically 15 pages) must be self-contained and sufficient for a referee to judge the result's significance, even if they do not read the marked appendix. It strictly forbids external links or online supplements for review.