Skill UI

A comprehensive guide for authors responding to IEEE ICDE peer reviews. Learn how to structure both rebuttals to initial concerns and detailed revise-and-resubmit change documents. The guide emphasizes strategic triage, anchoring answers to concrete evidence, addressing systems-level pushback (e.g., baselines, cost), and maintaining feasibility discipline within tight revision deadlines.

This guide outlines the complex process of converting an accepted, triple-blind academic paper into the final, professional camera-ready version required by IEEE conferences (e.g., ICDM). Key steps include de-anonymizing the text by restoring author names, affiliations, and acknowledgements; compressing the content if accepted as a short paper; adhering to strict IEEE formatting and page limits; completing electronic copyright transfer (eCopyright); and registering for mandatory in-person presentation.

This guide outlines the professional and technical process for authors responding to peer reviewers after a major conference submission (e.g., ICDT). It emphasizes that the revision must be a substantive correction—closing all identified proofs gaps, clarifying models, and documenting changes—rather than a mere argument or debate over taste. It provides a structured, point-by-point approach for maximizing the chances of acceptance.

This guide provides strict guidelines for structuring technical conference papers, especially when supplementary proofs are required. It emphasizes the critical rule that the main body (typically 15 pages) must be self-contained and sufficient for a referee to judge the result's significance, even if they do not read the marked appendix. It strictly forbids external links or online supplements for review.