Skill UI

This is the definitive workflow guide for submitting academic manuscripts in Chinese sport science. It helps researchers determine the manuscript's sub-discipline, methodological approach, theoretical level, and target audience, ensuring accurate matching with specific CSSCI-level journals. It serves as a crucial router to prevent misdirected submissions.

A comprehensive methodological guide for authors positioning their empirical manuscripts within a theoretical debate, particularly for high-level journals like Cognitive Psychology. It teaches authors to move beyond simple literature reviews by identifying a clear theoretical question, naming specific rival models, and demonstrating precisely why existing evidence is insufficient to resolve the conflict. This structure ensures the contribution is framed as an adjudication or a novel model.

A comprehensive guide to understanding the rigorous, model-driven review process at top cognitive psychology journals. Learn how editors and experts evaluate theoretical impact, methodological rigor, model identifiability, and data reproducibility. Use this guide to stress-test your manuscript before submission, preempt common rejection reasons, and shape your work to maximize its chances of acceptance in demanding academic venues.

A comprehensive guide for structuring and writing academic rebuttals for major conferences. It details time budgeting, how to address common reviewer objections with concrete evidence, and best practices for maintaining professional credibility throughout the intense review cycle.

A comprehensive guide detailing the meticulous steps required to transform an accepted conference paper into its final, public, camera-ready version. It covers de-anonymization, integrating complex reviewer feedback, coordinating artifact release, and ensuring consistency with the permanently recorded OpenReview forum.

This comprehensive guide provides expert protocols for writing the 'Related Work' section in Machine Learning papers. It teaches authors how to maintain 'versioned honesty' by meticulously triaging the literature into distinct lanes (e.g., method lineage, model artifacts, evaluation infrastructure). It covers advanced topics like managing concurrent work, citing arXiv status accurately, and avoiding self-citation violations, ensuring the paper is positioned rigorously within the rapidly evolving academic field.

A comprehensive guide detailing the rigorous submission process for major academic conferences like COLM. It covers strict formatting rules (e.g., 9-page limit), maintaining double-blind anonymity, mandatory LLM usage disclosure, and techniques for preventing identity leaks through technical sweeps. Essential reading for authors navigating the complex academic publishing lifecycle.

A comprehensive guide for drafting author responses to highly technical peer reviews in top-tier theoretical conferences. Learn how to repair perceived gaps, address objections regarding proof correctness, tightness, and novelty-of-technique, while adhering to specific academic policies and structure.

This comprehensive audit checklist guides authors preparing a paper for the COLT Conference on Learning Theory. It details crucial requirements such as the 12-page PMLR format, single-PDF assembly, and double-anonymous formatting. It helps authors preemptively detect common submission flaws, including parallel-submission violations and formatting errors, ensuring the manuscript meets high academic standards.

This guide provides best practices for structuring complex academic manuscripts, particularly for conferences requiring a single-PDF submission model. It details how to optimally split content between the limited body (e.g., 12 pages) and the extensive appendix, ensuring that the crucial theorems, proofs, and auxiliary lemmas are presented in a verifiable and highly readable manner for peer reviewers. Key techniques include implementing restatement discipline and writing roadmap paragraphs for clear verification paths.

A comprehensive project management framework for authors submitting theoretical papers to major conferences (e.g., COLT). This guide outlines the entire lifecycle, emphasizing backward planning from the deadline, milestone setting (Result Freeze, Verification Pass), and critical quality checks, including proof assembly, anonymity sweeps, and rebuttal response. It is designed to mitigate common academic writing risks and ensure a robust submission process.

A sophisticated guide for academic writers on structuring the literature review section of communication science manuscripts. It teaches authors how to move beyond simple summaries by actively positioning their hypotheses against existing empirical debates, identifying precise knowledge gaps, and adjudicating rival theoretical accounts. This skill ensures the work reads as a cumulative, theory-testing contribution suitable for top-tier academic journals.