Skill UI

Provides comprehensive guidelines on structuring academic manuscripts for Acta Automatica Sinica (AAS). Learn how to effectively separate core contributions (main text) from supporting details, such as lengthy proofs, supplementary simulations, and extensive datasets, ensuring the paper remains concise and highly readable while maintaining scientific completeness for reviewers.

This guide teaches authors how to structure scientific manuscripts by correctly partitioning core findings, decisive evidence, and the main narrative into the body text, while moving exhaustive datasets, full protocols, and secondary characterization into the Supporting Information (SI). It ensures the main paper is stand-alone and convincing.

A comprehensive guide for drafting academic abstracts, specifically tailored for journals focusing on rural and agricultural economics. It enforces a strict five-sentence structure, requiring the inclusion of quantified findings, naming specific household survey datasets (e.g., CFPS, CHIP), and detailing rigorous identification strategies. This skill helps users eliminate boilerplate language and ensure semantic alignment between Chinese and English summaries.

This guide provides detailed instructions for authors on structuring the Related Work section for ACM IMC papers. It emphasizes that related work must cover not only prior claims but critically analyze prior datasets, vantage points, tools, and methodologies. It teaches techniques like delta-first positioning and proper venue attribution to demonstrate deep domain expertise and avoid common academic pitfalls.

This guide provides comprehensive best practices for authors to enhance the reproducibility of technical research papers (especially in networking and computer science). It covers documenting proofs, pinning simulation setups, reporting parameters, and best practices for releasing code and datasets, transforming a paper from a claim into a verifiable scientific artifact.

This guide provides a comprehensive framework for building verifiable reproducibility evidence for academic manuscripts. It instructs authors on critical engineering disciplines, including freezing environment dependencies, controlling random seeds, versioning datasets and models, and creating anonymous, self-contained running materials that stand up to rigorous external peer review.

Provides a comprehensive guide on structuring scientific manuscripts, addressing the proper placement of core evidence, detailed proofs, extended experiments, and large datasets in appendices and supplementary materials for academic journals. Ensures crucial findings are in the main text while maintaining clarity and adhering to double-blind review standards.

This guide teaches authors how to precisely position their academic contribution within existing specialized literature, particularly in finance and banking. It moves beyond vague claims by anchoring the work to canonical economic mechanisms and distinguishing the specific 'delta' (new shocks, frictions, or datasets). Mastering this skill ensures the manuscript clearly articulates its unique value and policy relevance to experts.

A comprehensive guide for converting manuscripts from traditional author-date citation styles to the current Molecular Cell/Cell Press numbered format. This skill details the mechanics of in-text superscripts (ordered by first appearance), the creation of a single, continuous numbered reference list, and the required formatting for journal articles, books, and datasets. It ensures authors correctly transition their work to meet rigorous academic publishing standards.

A comprehensive guide for authors submitting to Nature Geoscience. It details the critical distinction between the main article text, online Methods, and Supplementary Information (SI). Learn how to ensure your core findings are stand-alone and decisive, while relegating extensive datasets, model ensembles, and derivations to the SI, maintaining academic rigor and clarity.

This guide provides strict guidelines for structuring supplementary material for PerCom conference papers. The core rule is that the main paper body (within the tight 9-page budget) must be self-contained, allowing a reviewer to make a decision without accessing the dataset or appendix. Learn how to properly partition evidence, manage page budgets, and adhere to double-blind review rules.

This guide provides authors with best practices for structuring scientific papers, specifically focusing on the division of content between the main body (The Letter) and the Supplemental Material (SM). It emphasizes the 'stand-alone' rule, ensuring the core argument remains fully understandable without consulting the SM, while effectively organizing detailed derivations, extended datasets, and secondary controls in the appendix.