Skill UI

This skill produces comprehensive 360-degree feedback instruments or structured performance reports. It guides users through collecting multi-rater input across core competencies like leadership, communication, and execution. Ideal for performance reviews, professional development planning, and assessing employee impact. The output adheres to best practices, ensuring development-oriented and behaviorally anchored feedback.

This skill transforms raw notes, bullet points, or unstructured memories into comprehensive, professional performance reviews. It structures the output for various review types (Self-assessment, Manager, Peer, 360 feedback), ensuring coverage of key achievements, core strengths, constructive areas for growth, and measurable development goals. Ideal for annual reviews, mid-year check-ins, and formal performance documentation.

This guide helps researchers assess whether their education topic has broad significance for a general journal like AERJ, and how to define the dominant research lens (Policy, Teaching, Development, etc.). It provides a structured methodology for sharpening focus and improving academic framing.

This guide teaches users how to transform a collection of historical facts and sources into a sustained, contestable, and nuanced academic argument. It focuses on establishing a clear thesis, defining the stakes, building evidence chains, and proactively addressing counter-arguments, moving beyond mere description to provide genuine scholarly contribution.

This skill provides architectural guidance for writing high-level academic history articles, specifically tailored for the American Historical Review (AHR). It helps writers ensure that the narrative development and the core historical argument are seamlessly interwoven, adhering to strict length and scholarly standards. Use it when outlining complex drafts or restructuring material that feels disjointed.

Designed for advanced academic reviews, this framework guides the development of a unifying 'spine' that transcends simple literature summaries. It forces the writer to impose a novel organizational logic—such as a typology, process model, or integrating construct—thereby achieving genuine theory advancement and defining the field's future research agenda. Use this when the draft reads like a disconnected list of papers.

This skill guides the stress-testing of theoretical manuscripts by focusing purely on logical coherence. It helps authors develop robust arguments by verifying proposition chains, running counterfactual thought experiments, addressing rival theories, and identifying disconfirming cases. It ensures the internal consistency and rigor of a theory, independent of empirical data analysis.

This guide helps researchers navigate and interpret the rigorous, multi-round developmental review process of the Academy of Management Review (AMR). It explains the core criteria (theoretical contribution, logical soundness) and decision signals, assisting authors in understanding editor priorities and triaging reviewer comments before drafting a response. It is a strategic guide for understanding the academic feedback process.

A comprehensive guide for researchers developing manuscripts in Accounting, Organizations, and Society (AOS). It teaches how to select, deeply inhabit, and generate analysis using established social or organizational theories (e.g., Institutional Theory, Bourdieu, Foucault). The goal is to ensure the theory is the generative engine of the paper, rather than merely decorative framing. This framework guides the transition from description to rigorous, theory-driven contribution.

This skill guides the transformation of visual observations and documentary evidence into a sustained, contestable academic thesis, suitable for high-level scholarly publication. It teaches how to explicitly state a claim (the thesis), define its scholarly stakes, and rigorously warrant every interpretive leap using evidence chains and anticipating counter-readings. Use this when a draft is descriptive but lacks a clear, disputed argument.

Provides a comprehensive guide to the developmental, multi-round review process at Administrative Science Quarterly (ASQ). It explains decision types, reviewer roles, what to expect in each revision round, and how to strategically interpret complex decision letters to improve manuscript quality and submission strategy.

A comprehensive guide for polishing Developmental Psychology manuscripts. It ensures adherence to APA 7th edition standards, focusing on foregrounding developmental change, using JARS reporting for methods and results, and correctly formatting the Abstract and Public Significance Statement based on the required length tier. It helps authors shift focus from single-age findings to developmental trajectories and mechanisms.