Skill UI

This agent provides a critical framework for navigating corporate environments, contrasting internal jargon and process visibility (Ding In) with objective, real-world evidence and user experience (Ding Out). It helps users move beyond subjective 'feelings' or polished reports, structuring complex tasks into verifiable components: Goal, Acceptance Criteria, Action, Evidence, and Risk. Ideal for project management, status reporting, and critical thinking in a corporate setting.

This specialized skill guides the creation of long-form structural critical essays and detailed academic dossiers, primarily for Chinese academic contexts. It utilizes the CrossFrame methodology to first establish a foundational structure, define evidence boundaries, and identify key mechanisms, before applying a critical matrix. The output is highly structured, ensuring depth, rigorous source checking, and comprehensive critical analysis suitable for complex intellectual work.

This skill provides comprehensive guidance for authors submitting to Accounts of Chemical Research (ACS). It helps researchers understand the journal's unique niche: publishing concise, first-person, narrative accounts of a research program's evolution, rather than comprehensive field reviews or primary data reports. It serves as a fit-checking tool, guiding manuscript framing, required evidence, and house style.

A comprehensive guide for authors targeting the Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics (ARA&A). It details the journal's unique positioning as a high-impact, invited review venue, emphasizing that it publishes critical syntheses, not primary research. Use this tool to scope, frame, and check the evidence bar, house style, and submission requirements for authoritative, cross-disciplinary astronomical reviews.

This guide assists researchers in structuring and presenting academic evidence for top-tier journals like ASQ. It provides best practices for both qualitative (establishing transparent data-to-theory links, coding transparency) and quantitative (ensuring robust mechanism testing and alternative explanation checks) analyses. It ensures all theoretical claims are auditable and fully supported by the raw data.

This skill provides an authoritative guide for assessing whether a comprehensive review article is suitable for Chemical Reviews (Chem Rev). It details the journal's high standards, emphasizing that submissions must be exhaustive, critically analytical syntheses of the entire field, not primary experimental reports or progress updates. Use this tool to refine scope, structure, and evidence depth before submission, ensuring alignment with the journal's 'invited venue' status.

This comprehensive skill assists authors in determining if their Earth or space science manuscript is suitable for Geophysical Research Letters (GRL). It provides detailed guidelines covering journal positioning, required scope (atmosphere, ocean, solid earth, etc.), the method and evidence bar, strict house style rules (brevity, structure, figures), and a final pre-submission checklist. It is designed to help authors re-frame and maximize the impact of single, highly significant findings.

This guide walks authors through the entire academic publishing lifecycle for international marketing journals. It details the editorial pipeline, from initial administrative checks and editor screening to the detailed review process, including common desk-reject triggers (e.g., single-country data, lack of equivalence evidence). It also provides strategies for productive waiting, drafting anticipated objections, and managing revision decisions.

A specialized tool for researchers aiming to publish in the Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization (JEBO). It helps authors assess the suitability of their behavioral, institutional, or organizational economics manuscript by analyzing the journal's scope, methodological bar, required evidence, and formatting standards. It serves as a pre-submission re-framing and checklist mechanism.

This skill provides a comprehensive guide and checklist for targeting the Journal of Experimental Medicine (JEM). It analyzes the manuscript's fit, required mechanistic depth, expected evidence bar (e.g., in vivo models, genetic dissection), and specific formatting requirements for submissions to this highly selective immunology journal. Use this tool for venue selection and manuscript re-framing.

A comprehensive guide and checklist for authors targeting Physical Review Applied (PRApplied). This skill helps evaluate whether a manuscript successfully bridges fundamental physics principles (e.g., quantum, photonics, energy) with concrete technological applications, providing heuristics on scope, evidence standards, and house style for submission.

This comprehensive skill guides authors through the complex process of submitting manuscripts to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS). It covers journal positioning, scope fit (from natural to social sciences), required evidence standards, house style rules (like the Significance Statement), and a detailed pre-submission checklist to ensure manuscripts meet high academic publication standards.