Skill UI

This guide helps authors structure lengthy academic manuscripts, ensuring the main text maintains a clear, focused narrative while relegating supportive, detailed evidence to the appendices or supplementary materials. It outlines the 'determinative' principle, advising where to place hyperparameters, extended experiments, proof details, and code links to meet high journal standards and maximize readability for reviewers.

This skill guides researchers through the entire end-to-end lifecycle of submitting a research paper to a journal. It structures a 12-step pipeline, covering everything from initial topic selection and literature review to experimentation, reproducibility, submission, peer review, revision, and final camera-ready versioning. It acts as a comprehensive project dashboard for managing the entire academic publishing journey.

This skill guides authors in transforming raw experimental data into a compelling, logically structured scientific narrative suitable for top-tier journals like JACS. It teaches how to explicitly define the 'chemical advance' by building an evidence-backed claim chain: Problem $ ightarrow$ Advance $ ightarrow$ Evidence $ ightarrow$ Significance. It ensures that every claim of novelty is rigorously supported by data and compares the work explicitly against the closest prior art.

A comprehensive guide for authors responding to journal reviewers' reports (e.g., JACS). It details how to systematically triage comments into data-required, clarification, or disagreement; how to structure a professional, point-by-point response letter; and how to maintain scientific rigor when performing necessary experiments.

Provides a comprehensive guide on structuring scientific manuscripts, addressing the proper placement of core evidence, detailed proofs, extended experiments, and large datasets in appendices and supplementary materials for academic journals. Ensures crucial findings are in the main text while maintaining clarity and adhering to double-blind review standards.

A comprehensive workflow guide for authors responding to major journal decision letters (R&R or reject-and-resubmit). This resource provides a structured approach to triaging conflicting referee comments, prioritizing editor concerns, planning necessary new experimental treatments, and crafting a professional, persuasive response letter to maximize publication chances in top-tier academic journals.

This tool serves as a comprehensive workflow router for authors targeting the Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization (JEBO). It guides users through the entire academic writing process, from initial topic selection and literature positioning to experimental design, robustness checks, and rebuttal strategy, ensuring the manuscript meets the unique methodological requirements of behavioral economics.

A comprehensive guide for developing and defending research methodologies for top-tier academic journals, such as the Journal of Management Information Systems (JMIS). It details how to properly design studies—whether they involve econometrics, behavioral experiments, or design-science artifacts—to establish credible causal identification and meet scholarly rigor, while adhering to strict manuscript length limits.

This guide helps researchers structure academic manuscripts submitted to the Journal of Software (JOS). It outlines the critical division between core contributions (which must reside in the main text) and supporting details (which belong in appendices or supplementary materials). Learn how to properly manage experimental results, proofs, and supplementary data to ensure the main narrative remains self-contained and highly impactful.

This skill provides a comprehensive guide and checklist for targeting the Journal of Experimental Medicine (JEM). It analyzes the manuscript's fit, required mechanistic depth, expected evidence bar (e.g., in vivo models, genetic dissection), and specific formatting requirements for submissions to this highly selective immunology journal. Use this tool for venue selection and manuscript re-framing.

This guide helps authors prepare manuscripts for submission to specialized academic journals by simulating the critiques from various expert subcultures (e.g., decision theorists, experimentalists). It teaches users how to anticipate potential objections, strengthen core arguments, and structure their findings to maximize the likelihood of acceptance.

A comprehensive guide on crafting effective technical rebuttals for top-tier academic conferences. Learn to strategically triage reviewer objections, moving beyond mere argumentation. The focus is on providing verifiable evidence, running new experiments, and maintaining professional tone to maximize your paper's chances of acceptance.