Skill UI

This skill provides an authoritative guide for assessing whether a comprehensive review article is suitable for Chemical Reviews (Chem Rev). It details the journal's high standards, emphasizing that submissions must be exhaustive, critically analytical syntheses of the entire field, not primary experimental reports or progress updates. Use this tool to refine scope, structure, and evidence depth before submission, ensuring alignment with the journal's 'invited venue' status.

A comprehensive guide for researchers on developing robust and original economic topics, particularly within the context of Chinese industrial economics. It emphasizes structuring research around clean policy quasi-experiments, quantifiable empirical facts, and defining 3-5 distinct marginal contributions to ensure scholarly depth and avoid common pitfalls.

This comprehensive guide provides authors with detailed standards for preparing high-quality, publishable scientific manuscripts for the Chinese Journal of Computers (CJC). It covers critical academic elements, including writing the four-element reporting abstract, structuring the narrative (Introduction, Methods, Experiments), maintaining consistent terminology and symbols, adhering to Chinese legislative units, and mastering the GB/T 7714 citation format. It ensures the final submission meets the rigorous linguistic and structural demands of top-tier academic journals.

This skill provides a structured framework for responding to external referee reports in academic publishing. It guides authors through classifying reviewer comments, planning necessary revisions (experiments, derivations), and drafting meticulous point-by-point rebuttal letters. It emphasizes that the reply must accurately reflect actual changes made to the manuscript, ensuring professional and compliant academic communication.

A comprehensive guide for drafting or polishing long-form, integrative manuscripts for cognitive psychology journals. It teaches authors how to weave multiple experiments and formal models into a single, continuous theoretical argument, ensuring rigorous structure, narrative flow, and adherence to APA-style statistical reporting.

This skill helps researchers assess whether their accounting manuscript is suitable for premier, broad-scope journals like Contemporary Accounting Research (CAR). It thoroughly evaluates the paper's contribution, methodological rigor (including archival, experimental, analytical, and field methods), structural fit, and provides critical insights on submission guidelines and potential alternative venues.

A comprehensive guide for structuring and presenting rigorous, high-impact experimental chapters suitable for top-tier computer science journals. Learn to design experiments driven by Research Questions (RQ), select fair baselines, conduct statistical significance testing, and implement ablation/sensitivity analyses. Ensures evidence is reproducible and perfectly aligns with abstract claims.

A comprehensive guide for authors addressing the rebuttal window for major NLP/AI conferences (like EACL). It details how to strategically triage reviewer objections, craft responses for both individual reviewers and the action editor's meta-review, plan runnable in-window experiments, and make critical decisions about the paper's future venue.

This comprehensive routing skill guides users through the complex process of selecting the most appropriate English-language academic journal for their manuscript. It acts as a high-level meta-guide, moving beyond single-journal profiles. Users classify their work based on its contribution type (e.g., causal effect, new theory), methodological shape (e.g., structural, field experiment), target discipline (e.g., finance, marketing), and ultimate submission goal (e.g., top-5 venue). It provides actionable advice for re-framing and optimizing fit.

A comprehensive guide for authors to sharpen the marginal contribution of their Experimental Economics (ExpEcon) manuscripts. It moves beyond simple topic novelty by outlining a structured ladder of contribution (e.g., confound removal, new decisive treatment) and teaching authors how to precisely map their design against canonical behavioral paradigms and prior work. Essential for improving academic rigor and manuscript acceptance rates.

A comprehensive guide for authors responding to revise-and-resubmit reports in Experimental Economics (ExpEcon). It details how to triage complex reviewer comments, plan for necessary new data collection (new treatments, more sessions), address critical methodological concerns like deception or power deficits, and structure a highly persuasive, point-by-point response letter.

A comprehensive guide and checklist for authors submitting manuscripts to Experimental Economics via the Editorial Manager portal. It covers critical steps including anonymization for double-blind review, verifying adherence to 'no deception' and 'real incentives' gates, and ensuring all required supplementary materials (instructions, data appendices) are included before final submission.