Skill UI

This guide helps academics determine if their research contribution is fundamentally about market microstructure—such as order flow, liquidity, price impact, or trading mechanisms—making it suitable for the Journal of Financial Markets (JFM). It provides a rigorous 'mechanism question' test to distinguish between microstructural findings and broader corporate or asset pricing issues.

This tool acts as a comprehensive workflow router for researchers targeting The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization (JLEO). It guides users through the entire academic process, from initial topic selection and literature positioning to developing models, ensuring robustness, and handling revision and rebuttal stages. It helps diagnose current bottlenecks and determines the optimal next specialized skill to use.

This workflow orchestrates the entire manuscript submission process for the Journal of Applied Psychology (JAP). It guides authors by ensuring the paper addresses two critical standards: a theoretical contribution to I-O science, and high rigor in design and measurement. It routes users through specific stages—from topic selection and theory development to study design, data analysis, and revision.

This guide provides a comprehensive roadmap for authors navigating the Journal of Software (JOS) peer review process. It details the entire state chain, from initial submission and expert review to final acceptance and revision rounds. It helps users understand the expected timeline, the roles of editors and reviewers, and the specific actionable steps required at every stage to ensure successful publication.

This router guides authors through the entire academic manuscript lifecycle for submissions to the Journal of Public Economics (JPubE). It diagnoses structural bottlenecks and ensures that the research meets all critical gates, starting from initial topic selection and contribution framing, through rigorous data analysis, figure design, drafting, and finally preparing for submission and rebuttal.

This skill acts as a comprehensive router for manuscripts targeting the Journal of Urban Economics (JUE). It diagnoses the current stage of research—from initial topic selection and spatial identification to robustness testing, writing, and rebuttal. It ensures the paper addresses the core spatial-economic requirements necessary for high-impact urban economics publications, guiding researchers through the entire scholarly lifecycle.

A comprehensive preflight checklist for submitting manuscripts to high-tier academic journals. It verifies workflow compliance (e.g., ScholarOne), double-anonymity, adherence to strict page limits, preparation of the transparency commitment, and proper formatting (APA 7th). This guide ensures authors are fully prepared for the rigorous academic submission process.

This guideline assists researchers in structuring complex scientific manuscripts for top-tier journals like Molecular Cell. It details the required components—including Summary, Introduction, Results, Discussion, and STAR Methods—while adhering to strict word counts, display item limits, and narrative flow, ensuring the core scientific mechanism is presented clearly and persuasively.

A comprehensive guide for researchers targeting Nature Astronomy. This skill helps authors frame their astrophysical or cosmological findings to meet the journal's high standards, emphasizing broad conceptual significance over narrow sub-field advancements. It covers scope fit, structural requirements (e.g., narrative flow, abstract writing), statistical rigor, and common pitfalls like desk-reject triggers, ensuring submissions appeal to a wide, expert audience.

This skill is a comprehensive guide for authors determining if their chemistry manuscript meets the conceptual and structural standards of high-impact journals like Nature Chemistry. It covers journal positioning, required scope (conceptual advance, interdisciplinary impact), evidence rigor, and narrative flow, helping authors re-frame their work and mitigate desk-reject risks before official submission.

This tool acts as an orchestrator for writing *Progress in Human Geography* manuscripts. It guides authors through the entire writing process by routing the piece based on its lifecycle stage, genre (Review Article vs. Progress Report), and whether the topic is truly review-worthy. It systematically ensures the resulting work is synthetic, critical, and focused on developing a core academic argument.

Provides expert guidance on structuring scholarly essays for major academic publications like PMLA. It helps writers organize complex arguments, ensuring a clear, compelling flow from problem statement to conclusion for a generalist academic readership. Essential for outlining or reorganizing sprawling drafts while adhering to strict word counts (6,000–9,000 words).