Skill UI

This skill refines academic prose specifically for publications like PMLA. It ensures that sophisticated theoretical arguments are presented with exceptional clarity and conciseness, making the writing highly accessible to a general membership of language and literature scholars, without sacrificing intellectual rigor. Ideal for polishing drafts after the core argument and structure are finalized.

This guide provides guidelines for ensuring that academic proofs are independently verifiable, particularly for proofs-focused conferences. It covers creating self-contained proof appendices, meticulously defining all underlying assumptions in a 'model box' contract, and ensuring perfect synchronization between the short conference proceedings and the full arXiv version.

This skill polishes scholarly prose, abstracts, and introductions to align with the narrative-driven, ambitious style of the Quarterly Journal of Economics (QJE). It focuses on making the core research contribution immediately legible to a general-interest, non-specialist reader, ensuring the big idea lands fast, even in long-form empirical papers. The skill guides users on structuring the 'introduction arc,' stating findings with concrete numbers, and minimizing technical jargon.

This skill is designed to polish the writing style and structure of interdisciplinary Research Policy manuscripts. It ensures that the core innovation-studies argument is clear and accessible to diverse readerships, including economists, management scholars, and policymakers. It focuses on structuring the narrative, translating field-specific jargon, and making the policy contribution visible and impactful throughout the paper.

A comprehensive guide for authors submitting technical papers to top-tier conferences, detailing how to effectively partition content between the main paper body and supplementary artifacts. It emphasizes the critical rule that all decision-making evidence (e.g., headline results, key performance metrics) must reside within the limited page budget of the main submission, ensuring the work is judgeable even without accessing raw data.

This skill revises legal prose to match the high standards of major academic journals, ensuring clarity and readability for a generalist legal audience (e.g., non-specialist scholars, judges, and practitioners). It focuses on making the argument visible in the main text, maintaining a confident, plain voice, and properly balancing supporting material in footnotes with core reasoning in the body. Ideal for final polish passes before submission.

This guide helps researchers structure and refine academic papers for the Journal on Communications (JOC). It provides a framework for separating core, decision-making content (main text) from supporting details (appendices/supplementary material), ensuring the manuscript remains scientifically rigorous yet adheres to strict length constraints (e.g., ~12000 characters). It teaches how to use a 'decisive three-question' standard.

This guide teaches how to structure the introduction of a scholarly paper to effectively position its unique contribution against the current academic frontier. Instead of writing a general literature review, it focuses on articulating the 'delta'—what the paper does that prior work could not—making the work highly visible to general-interest journal editors and referees.

This skill provides a comprehensive, reproducible rubric for evaluating scholarly and scientific work. It covers nine critical dimensions—including problem statement, methodology, data evidence, analysis rigor, and citation quality—making it ideal for reviewing research papers, grant proposals, literature reviews, and academic theses. Use it to provide structured, actionable, and professional feedback to enhance scholarly output.

This skill helps refine a raw concept into a complete, professional talk pitch. It generates multiple strategic angles, analyzes their strengths and weaknesses, suggests compelling titles, and drafts both short abstracts and long CFP descriptions. A mandatory checkpoint ensures the user selects the optimal narrative path before finalization, making it ideal for conference submission preparation.

A rigorous methodology for systematic problem diagnosis and consequential decision-making. It operates in two modes: Problem Analysis (for root cause identification using IS/IS-NOT contrast) and Decision Analysis (for prioritizing options by screening MUSTs, weighting WANTs, and assessing adverse consequences). Ideal for complex engineering and business scenarios requiring structured evidence and risk assessment.

A rapid decision-making framework (Observe, Orient, Decide, Act) designed for high-pressure, dynamic environments. It advocates acting on high-probability signals (e.g., 70% confidence) immediately and cycling through observation and action quickly, rather than waiting for perfect certainty. Ideal for incident response, debugging moving targets, and time-bound crisis management.