Skill UI

This tutor specializes in developing advanced critical thinking and argumentative skills across humanities and social sciences. It covers disciplines including philosophy, sociology, psychology, political science, and literature. Instead of providing simple answers, the focus is on teaching students how to construct nuanced, evidence-based arguments, utilize multiple theoretical frameworks (e.g., Marxist, feminist), engage in close textual reading, and master the structure of academic writing, supporting both Chinese and Western academic traditions.

A comprehensive coach for national and provincial civil service exams (国考/省考). This skill covers both the Administrative Aptitude Test (行测) and Essay Writing (申论), focusing on strategic test-taking, pattern recognition, and deep policy analysis. It also prepares candidates for structured interviews and official document writing, providing skills applicable to government careers globally.

This comprehensive skill guides authors through the rigorous submission process for Angewandte Chemie International Edition. It provides detailed criteria covering scientific scope, required novelty, evidentiary standards for claims (mechanistic, physical), structural formatting, and common desk-reject triggers, ensuring manuscripts meet the journal's high academic bar.

Provides a comprehensive guide to the developmental, multi-round review process at Administrative Science Quarterly (ASQ). It explains decision types, reviewer roles, what to expect in each revision round, and how to strategically interpret complex decision letters to improve manuscript quality and submission strategy.

Provides comprehensive guidelines for authors preparing high-impact front matter for leading cancer journals (e.g., Cancer Cell). It details the structure and content requirements for the Summary, Highlights, eTOC blurb, and Graphical Abstract, ensuring mechanistic accuracy, impact, and adherence to publication standards.

This sophisticated tool is designed to polish scientific manuscripts for high-impact, rigorous journals. It guides users in structuring a mechanistic narrative, ensuring that every claim made in the text is precisely calibrated to the strength of the supporting experimental evidence (e.g., distinguishing correlation from necessity). It focuses on scientific storytelling, nomenclature consistency, and eliminating hype, transforming raw research data into a polished, scholarly article.

This skill guides researchers through the critical pre-writing process of evaluating a scientific finding's scope, mechanistic depth, and significance. It stress-tests whether the work constitutes a complete, hypothesis-driven story suitable for top-tier journals, helping authors determine if they need to strengthen the mechanism, collect more converging evidence, or adjust their target journal venue.

This guide acts as a structured workflow router for scientists preparing manuscripts for high-impact journals like Cell. It doesn't write the paper but diagnoses the current stage (e.g., narrative structure, data deposition, figure quality, citation style) and directs the author to the specific skill needed next, ensuring the manuscript meets the high standards of mechanistic completeness required for publication.

This skill provides a comprehensive guide for authors targeting the *China Public Administration Review*. It details the journal's academic scope, preferred research topics (e.g., governance, policy reform, digital government), required methodology, structural format, and common submission pitfalls. It helps users refine their manuscript to meet the high academic standards of a CSSCI-level journal.

This skill guides the architectural structure and rhetorical flow of a Critical Inquiry (CI) essay. Instead of following traditional IMRaD formats, it focuses on shaping the narrative arc: how to hook a non-specialist reader, build intellectual pressure, make a clear intervention (the turn), and conclude with expansive new questions. Ideal for long-form humanistic prose that needs to guide a cross-field audience through complex arguments.

Provides a detailed structural guide for writing high-quality literature reviews, specifically tailored for top-tier journals in Public Administration. It coaches users on transitioning from a simple 'listing' format to a critical 'dialogue' format, ensuring proper theoretical anchoring (e.g., Public Administration theory), balancing international and local literature, and clearly defining the paper's unique contribution and knowledge gaps.

A specialized tool designed to guide authors in drafting professional and structured rebuttal letters for academic journals, particularly those in Public Administration. It provides detailed templates and guidance for addressing reviewer comments, focusing specifically on strengthening theoretical frameworks and justifying methodological fits to meet high academic standards.