Skill UI

A comprehensive framework for preparing for high-stakes, adversarial board meetings, investor updates, or fundraising pitches. This guide teaches founders how to master key business metrics (MRR, burn rate, CAC/LTV) cold, anticipate the toughest questions, and structure an honest, confident narrative that maintains credibility even when presenting bad news.

Drafts structured, high-quality grant proposals for major international and national funding agencies (e.g., NSF, KAKENHI, ERC, NSFC). This skill guides the user through the entire grant writing pipeline, transforming validated research ideas and literature into a reviewer-ready application that meets specific structural, narrative, and formatting requirements, significantly increasing funding success rates.

Master the art of writing highly competitive research proposals for major funding bodies, including NSF, NIH, DOE, DARPA, and NSTC. This skill provides comprehensive guidance on structuring technical narratives, developing specific aims, justifying budgets, incorporating broader impact statements, and ensuring compliance with diverse agency-specific guidelines and formatting requirements.

This technique guides users on how to use visual descriptions from music videos (MV), such as specific scenes, emotional themes (grief, loss), or real-world events, as powerful search anchors. Instead of only searching by title or artist, users can extract keywords from the visual narrative to refine search queries, significantly increasing the chances of identifying the correct song or tracing its origin. Ideal for music research and cultural analysis.

This profile acts as a narrative and synthesis partner, focusing on articulating the 'why' behind decisions rather than just the 'what.' It specializes in creating clear, structured written artifacts, refining design notes, and synthesizing complex tradeoffs. Wiggins helps ensure that the intent aligns with the execution, adjusting the explanation level and framing to suit any mixed audience, from engineers needing mechanisms to leaders needing implications.

This advanced tool generates a comprehensive, five-section academic paper outline (Abstract, Introduction, Method, Results, Discussion). Given a research topic, preferred style, and curated reference sources, it crafts a detailed narrative backbone aiming for 6,500-8,000 words. It ensures that each section contains sufficient concrete substance, sub-topics, and specific findings, providing a robust foundation for authors to expand into a full, high-quality research manuscript.

This skill provides comprehensive guidance for authors submitting to Accounts of Chemical Research (ACS). It helps researchers understand the journal's unique niche: publishing concise, first-person, narrative accounts of a research program's evolution, rather than comprehensive field reviews or primary data reports. It serves as a fit-checking tool, guiding manuscript framing, required evidence, and house style.

This guide provides authors with a comprehensive framework for positioning technical manuscripts for the ACM Interactive Surfaces and Spaces (ISS) conference. It covers essential areas like defining scope, aligning hardware evidence with interaction techniques, optimizing the narrative structure, and understanding the specific community expectations for spatial and tangible computing.

This guide teaches authors how to structure scientific manuscripts by correctly partitioning core findings, decisive evidence, and the main narrative into the body text, while moving exhaustive datasets, full protocols, and secondary characterization into the Supporting Information (SI). It ensures the main paper is stand-alone and convincing.

This guide provides rigorous standards for polishing scientific prose for high-impact materials journals. It focuses on improving narrative flow by emphasizing the structure-property-function argument, enforcing concision, standardizing materials nomenclature and units (SI), and eliminating hype-word inflation. Ideal for authors needing to transition a raw scientific draft into a polished, publishable manuscript.

This comprehensive guide provides best practices for structuring appendices and supplementary materials for high-level academic journals. It helps authors manage the balance between main text conciseness and academic completeness by clearly defining what belongs in the core narrative (main findings) versus what should be reserved for the supplementary section (detailed proofs, extended experiments, raw data, and multimedia).

This skill provides architectural guidance for writing high-level academic history articles, specifically tailored for the American Historical Review (AHR). It helps writers ensure that the narrative development and the core historical argument are seamlessly interwoven, adhering to strict length and scholarly standards. Use it when outlining complex drafts or restructuring material that feels disjointed.