Skill UI

A comprehensive guide for formatting academic manuscripts for the American Historical Review (AHR). This skill mandates adherence to the Chicago Manual of Style (CMOS) guidelines where all citations must be placed exclusively in footnotes or endnotes. It strictly prohibits the use of bibliography pages or in-text parenthetical citations, providing detailed rules for citing books, journals, digitized, and especially sensitive archival/manuscript sources.

A comprehensive preflight checklist for submitting manuscripts to major academic journals (e.g., American Sociological Review) via platforms like Sage Track. This guide ensures authors meet all technical requirements, including proper anonymity masking, adherence to specific word and length counts, proper formatting (ASA Style Guide), and managing required separate title pages, thereby minimizing avoidable desk-rejects and submission errors.

A comprehensive checklist detailing all mandatory requirements for submitting academic manuscripts (e.g., Contemporary Accounting Research). It verifies compliance on key areas including length limits, abstract word count, separated title pages, blind manuscripts, ethics approval (IRB/REB), data integrity statements, and correct payment proof. Use this before the final upload to ensure maximum readiness and avoid editorial rejection.

This guide provides best practices for structuring complex academic manuscripts, particularly for conferences requiring a single-PDF submission model. It details how to optimally split content between the limited body (e.g., 12 pages) and the extensive appendix, ensuring that the crucial theorems, proofs, and auxiliary lemmas are presented in a verifiable and highly readable manner for peer reviewers. Key techniques include implementing restatement discipline and writing roadmap paragraphs for clear verification paths.

A comprehensive guide detailing how to structure and submit highly technical papers to major academic conferences (e.g., EuroSys). It outlines the 'four shelves'—the 12-page core argument, references, artifact repositories, and appendices—ensuring that the main, decision-critical evidence is always contained within the primary reviewed pages, preventing the submission from failing due to overflow.

A comprehensive guide for authors submitting to FAccT, detailing the mandatory separation of content into three zones: the main Body, the Endmatter statements (including Ethics and AI Usage), and the Appendix/Supplementary material. It outlines strict rules regarding anonymity, page limits, and ensuring the core argument is decision-critical and visible from the main reviewed pages.

A comprehensive guide detailing the best practices for drafting and revising highly technical academic papers, specifically tailored for top-tier conferences like FOCS. It emphasizes front-loading key results within the first ten pages, pairing informal statements with formal theorems, and calibrating prose for a broad, non-specialist committee.

This guide provides strict guidelines for structuring technical conference papers, especially when supplementary proofs are required. It emphasizes the critical rule that the main body (typically 15 pages) must be self-contained and sufficient for a referee to judge the result's significance, even if they do not read the marked appendix. It strictly forbids external links or online supplements for review.

A comprehensive pre-submission guide for authors targeting high-impact journals like JBF. It details complex requirements such as double anonymization, mandatory fees, separate title pages, abstract length constraints, data statements, and proper declaration of generative AI use, ensuring manuscripts are journal-compliant before hitting 'submit'.

A comprehensive preflight checklist for authors submitting manuscripts to the Journal of Management Information Systems (JMIS). This guide details crucial steps for successful submission, including full double-blind anonymization techniques, specific formatting rules (≤50 pages, ≤150-word abstract), numbered referencing style, and the unique EIC email intake process. It ensures the manuscript package meets all requirements for initial double-blind review.

This skill guides users in rigorously polishing and structuring academic manuscripts for submission to the Journal of Communication (JoC). It ensures adherence to APA 7th edition standards, managing strict length limits (e.g., 35 pages, 150-word abstract), and structuring the prose to maximize cross-subfield reach. Focus areas include front-loading the theoretical contribution, defining jargon, and maintaining double-anonymity.

A comprehensive preflight checklist for submitting manuscripts to The Review of Economic Studies (REStud). It guides researchers through critical steps, including ensuring double-anonymity, adhering to Harvard author-date referencing, managing the length limit (~45 pages), and preparing supplementary online appendices. This tool ensures all academic formatting and procedural requirements are met before the final submission.