Skill UI

A comprehensive mentor for graduate students and early-career researchers, guiding the entire research lifecycle. This skill covers formulating rigorous research questions, designing studies (quantitative, qualitative, mixed-methods), conducting literature reviews, analyzing data, and writing publishable papers. It emphasizes methodological rigor, critical thinking, and ethical considerations.

This guide provides a structured methodology for articulating the unique and marginal contribution of a scholarly paper, particularly within macroeconomics. It teaches authors how to bridge the gap between theoretical modeling (quantitative-theory) and data-driven evidence (identified-empirical), ensuring that the novelty and scope are clearly communicated to a broad, general expert audience.

A comprehensive guide to assessing the fit of a macroeconomics research paper for top-tier journals, particularly the American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics (AEJ: Macro). It helps researchers determine if their work possesses the required broad interest, quantitative discipline, and policy relevance to succeed at AEJ: Macro, versus more specialized venues like AER, JME, or RED. This framework guides strategic academic writing.

This skill acts as a comprehensive workflow router for manuscripts targeting the American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics (AEJ: Macro). It guides the researcher through the entire publication lifecycle—from initial topic selection and literature positioning, through rigorous quantitative modeling (DSGE, SVAR), empirical identification, writing, to final submission and rebuttal strategy. It ensures the final paper meets the high standards of modern macroeconomics research.

This guide helps pure-mathematics researchers precisely state and frame the main theorems of their manuscripts for submission to top-tier journals. It emphasizes techniques for quantifying novelty, separating the core headline result from corollaries, and rigorously positioning the work relative to the existing state of the art, mimicking the structure of Annals of Mathematics submissions.

A comprehensive guide for academic authors on writing balanced, unbiased, and rigorous literature reviews. It teaches how to manage the fundamental tension between comprehensive coverage (ensuring nothing important is missed) and selective emphasis (foregrounding the most critical arguments). The framework ensures fairness across diverse theoretical schools, methodologies (quantitative, qualitative, etc.), and competing findings, while explicitly guarding against self-citation bias.

This guide provides a rigorous methodology for systematically gathering, reading, and synthesizing vast amounts of sociological research for comprehensive academic reviews. It focuses on ensuring comprehensive coverage across all methodological modes (quantitative, qualitative, computational, and theoretical), allowing users to build a robust evidence corpus and synthesis matrix rather than merely summarizing individual studies.

This guide assists researchers in structuring and presenting academic evidence for top-tier journals like ASQ. It provides best practices for both qualitative (establishing transparent data-to-theory links, coding transparency) and quantitative (ensuring robust mechanism testing and alternative explanation checks) analyses. It ensures all theoretical claims are auditable and fully supported by the raw data.

A comprehensive guide for structuring research manuscripts for top-tier academic journals (e.g., ASQ). It details the rigorous requirements for both qualitative (e.g., grounded theory, ethnography) and quantitative (e.g., causal inference, multilevel modeling) designs. Learn how to ensure theoretical fit, establish credibility, and design against alternative explanations to maximize the impact and rigor of your work.

A comprehensive guide for structuring and refining exhibits (tables and figures) for high-level academic journals. It provides best practices for both qualitative data (e.g., data-to-theory tables, process models) and quantitative data (e.g., cumulative regression, interaction plots), ensuring that the visual presentation strengthens the core argument. Focuses on self-contained, rigorously formatted, and interpretable scholarly communication.

This guide details the specific structure and rigor required for writing systems papers for top-tier academic conferences like ATC. It emphasizes the need for a self-standing, two-page abstract (Round One) and a full-paper narrative that is purely implementation and measurement driven. Key principles include quantifying costs alongside gains, structuring the narrative from problem to impact, and rigorously supporting claims with real-world evidence.

This guide details the stringent requirements for writing high-stakes scientific summaries, such as those required by top-tier journals. It teaches how to condense complex research into a single, unstructured, quantitative paragraph (≤ 150 words) that explicitly names the underlying mechanism, answers the 'how,' and conveys broad significance to a general life-science readership. Focuses on structure, clarity, and impact.