Skill UI

A comprehensive intelligence tool designed for clinical researchers to navigate the complex NIH grant landscape. It utilizes a detailed 6-step intake process (covering research idea, career stage, and data status) to perform a multi-faceted positioning analysis. The system maps research to appropriate NIH institutes using RePORTER data and generates an editable Word document containing actionable mechanism recommendations, submission timelines, and strategic guidance for funding applications.

This skill generates structured, professional summaries for clinical case presentations, handovers, and educational documentation. It supports established medical formats like SBAR and SOAP notes, ensuring all necessary components—from subjective complaints to recommendations—are systematically included. Designed for healthcare professionals to improve documentation clarity and facilitate seamless patient transitions. Note: This output is strictly for educational and documentation purposes and must not replace professional clinical judgment.

This skill helps users create high-impact, standalone executive summaries for complex documents, reports, or proposals. It structures the summary with a clear bottom line, actionable recommendations, and key findings, ensuring busy senior stakeholders can grasp the core message and make a decision quickly.

This comprehensive guide details the rigorous, multi-stage peer review pipeline used by major academic conferences (like ACM CHI). It breaks down the roles of the 1AC, 2AC, and external reviewers, explaining screening mechanisms like Desk Reject (DR) and Assisted Desk Reject (ADR). It covers the entire journey from initial recommendations to the final PC meeting, providing authors with a framework to interpret feedback and strategically revise their work.

This guide provides detailed structural and methodological advice for drafting the policy implications section of manuscripts submitted to academic journals focusing on rural China. It teaches authors how to elevate suggestions from generic statements to deeply grounded, significance-level policy recommendations, ensuring the implications are strictly anchored to the paper's empirical findings and specific agricultural/rural scenarios (Sannong).

This guide provides expert recommendations on organizing supplementary material for academic papers. It teaches authors how to distinguish between load-bearing evidence (for the main text) and reassuring, secondary data (for the internet appendix). Proper indexing, cross-referencing, and material triage are critical for creating a lean, navigable, and highly persuasive manuscript.

This comprehensive guide polishes academic manuscripts for top-tier economics journals. It focuses on refining rhetoric by eliminating vague, empty-significance phrases and improving policy recommendations. The skill helps authors transition from mere statistical reporting to articulating clear economic implications, ensuring consistency in tense, person, and terminology.

This guide helps researchers determine if their manuscript is suitable for highly quantitative, theory-driven journals. It emphasizes evaluating the core deliverable—whether it consists of a formal model, provable properties, and an algorithm, rather than relying solely on empirical data or policy recommendations. Essential for optimizing journal submission strategy.

This guide helps researchers structure the Policy Contribution Statement required by journals like JPP&M. It teaches how to transform solid research findings and data estimates into actionable, evidence-based policy recommendations. Focus areas include defining the policy conversation, identifying specific regulated actors, ensuring recommendations are within the actor's authority, and strictly linking claims to the empirical evidence provided.

This guide helps authors transform complex academic empirical findings into robust, actionable policy implications. It teaches how to structure recommendations across distinct time horizons (short, medium, and long) and institutional levels (micro, meso, and macro). The core principle is ensuring every suggested policy point is directly tied to the study's evidence, targets a specific government department, and aligns with national strategic goals, elevating the paper's impact.