Skill UI

A multi-phase workflow designed to guide users through complex problem analysis and solution design. Instead of providing immediate answers, it systematically enforces deep thinking by reviewing the problem's validity, assessing information gaps, performing root cause analysis, and iterating through solution vetting (self-check and final review). Ideal for complex technical troubleshooting, decision-making, or theoretical discussions requiring rigorous methodology.

This skill generates a comprehensive, structured Customer Success Plan (CSP) that serves as a joint roadmap between the Customer Success Manager (CSM) and the client. It guides collaboration through defined business goals, measurable success metrics (KPIs), and phased milestones across the entire customer lifecycle, from onboarding to renewal and expansion. Ideal for kickoff calls, Quarterly Business Reviews (QBRs), and joint planning sessions.

This router guides the entire lifecycle for writing complex, theory-driven academic manuscripts, particularly in fields like econometrics. It provides a structured roadmap spanning from initial topic selection and literature positioning through rigorous proof development, data simulation, drafting style, and the final submission/rebuttal phases. Use this resource when you are unsure of the correct sequential step or need a systematic check of all necessary components before finalizing your work.

A comprehensive preflight checklist designed for authors submitting manuscripts to top-tier academic journals, such as Management World. It guides users through critical checks on formatting, double-blind compliance, reference standards, word count, and required supplementary materials. Use this guide to ensure your paper meets strict technical requirements and avoid early rejection during the initial review phase.

A comprehensive guide for drafting responses to reviewers during the Revise & Resubmit (R&R) phase. It teaches authors how to transform developmental, theory-level critiques into a credible, point-by-point reply and improved manuscript. Focus is placed on maintaining a respectful, collaborative tone and demonstrating deep theoretical engagement.

A comprehensive guide for authors on navigating the two distinct response phases of academic conferences (e.g., PODS). It details how to write a concise, double-anonymous rebuttal (48-hour turn) and a structured revision cover letter, ensuring all technical gaps are addressed while maintaining anonymity and professional rigor.

Provides detailed strategies for authors responding to peer reviews in top-tier academic conferences like SIGMOD. It covers the distinct rules for the mid-round feedback phase and the formal revision letter, emphasizing structured responses, mandatory change highlighting, maintaining anonymity, and strategic content budgeting.