Skill UI

A comprehensive guide for authors on drafting a strategic response during the OpenReview cycle. This resource covers how to address reviewer objections, shape the Area Chair's meta-review summary, manage the discussion phase, and decide whether to defend the paper or withdraw for a future revision cycle. Focus on clarity, conciseness, and evidence-based arguments.

This comprehensive guide outlines the meticulous workflow for preparing a research paper for final publication (Camera-Ready) after acceptance at major NLP conferences like ACL. It covers critical steps including de-anonymization (restoring author details and acknowledgements), integrating mandates from meta-reviews, adding required disclosures (e.g., funding, AI assistance), and ensuring all technical metadata, font embedding, and licensing comply with the permanent open-access standards of the ACL Anthology.

A comprehensive audit checklist for authors submitting papers to major NLP conferences (like ACL) via OpenReview. This guide covers mandatory formatting rules, maintaining anonymity, addressing ethical declarations (Responsible NLP), managing resubmission links, and ensuring adherence to the entire submission workflow to prevent desk rejection.

This comprehensive guide provides a project management framework for publishing academic papers at major conferences like ACL. It details the complex "cycle-and-commit" rhythm, covering milestones from initial ARR submission through review, meta-review, commitment, camera-ready preparation, and final presentation. Learn techniques for backward planning, managing resubmission loops, and coordinating multiple papers across volatile academic cycles.

A comprehensive guide for drafting professional and strategic rebuttals for major academic conferences, such as ACM Multimedia. Learn how to triage reviewer comments, structure arguments for the Area Chair, address factual errors, and incorporate small, confirmatory results while maintaining anonymity and adhering to strict policy guardrails.

A comprehensive guide for authors preparing the supplementary material for multimedia conferences (e.g., ACM MM). It details how to structure the content, separating core arguments (Body) from supporting evidence (Supplement). Learn best practices for packaging videos, audio, and interactive demos, ensuring technical compatibility (H.264/MP4), maintaining anonymity for double-blind review, and creating a legible, reviewer-friendly submission index.

This guide teaches researchers how to structure a high-impact literature review for top-tier academic journals. It moves beyond merely summarizing recent empirical studies, focusing instead on establishing a deep theoretical lineage (e.g., earnings quality, audit theory), identifying specific, non-obvious research gaps, and clearly positioning the current study's unique contribution within the established academic discourse.

A comprehensive guide for authors on how to structure and write a professional, point-by-point rebuttal letter and revision explanation in response to rigorous academic reviews. It covers addressing specific critiques related to measurement, identification, institutional standards, and information mechanisms, ensuring the response is evidence-based, anonymous, and highly professional.

A comprehensive guide for authors responding to reviewer reports and editor decisions (major/minor revision, rejection). It details how to structure a point-by-point rebuttal letter, what new data (e.g., stability, benchmarking) must be added, and how to ensure the revised manuscript maintains a clear scientific advance while adhering to publication guidelines.

A comprehensive guide for authors responding to major journal decisions (e.g., R&R or reject-with-comments) in economics. This skill teaches a systematic approach to triaging reviewer comments, structuring the rebuttal letter point-by-point, and ensuring revisions are supported by new empirical evidence rather than just prose. It focuses on maintaining academic rigor and professional communication.

This skill acts as a workflow router, guiding researchers through the entire manuscript lifecycle for submissions to American Economic Journal: Microeconomics (AEJ: Micro). It does not write the paper, but diagnoses the current bottleneck—whether it's topic selection, model refinement, empirical testing, or rebuttal strategy—and specifies which specialized aejmic-* sub-skill to invoke next, ensuring the paper aligns with the specific requirements of AEJ: Micro. Triggered when users are unsure what step to take next, or when revising based on reviewer comments.

A guide for academic writers on how to succinctly position a research contribution against the single closest prior work in highly constrained formats (e.g., AER: Insights). It teaches authors to state the novelty (the 'delta') in one or two paragraphs, avoiding full literature reviews and focusing only on the marginal contribution.