Skill UI

This skill guides researchers in elevating observed findings into rigorously theoretical, generalizable, and falsifiable arguments suitable for top-tier academic journals. It provides structured methods for building mechanisms (empirical), defining comparative statics (formal), and establishing conceptual claims (normative). Use this when you need to prove that your contribution is novel, sharp, and matters to a general readership.

This skill guides political science scholars through the rigorous process of assessing whether their research project meets the high standards of top-tier journals (e.g., The Journal of Politics). It focuses on evaluating the work for general interest, theoretical innovation, methodological diversity, and appropriate scope (Research Article vs. Short Article) to maximize publication chances.

This guide helps researchers structure academic manuscripts submitted to the Journal of Software (JOS). It outlines the critical division between core contributions (which must reside in the main text) and supporting details (which belong in appendices or supplementary materials). Learn how to properly manage experimental results, proofs, and supplementary data to ensure the main narrative remains self-contained and highly impactful.

This skill serves as a comprehensive fit and venue-selection tool for submitting accounting manuscripts to the Journal of Accounting Research (JAR). It guides authors through evaluating the paper's empirical rigor, identification strategy, economic framing, and adherence to JAR's high academic standards. Use it when targeting JAR or determining if the research belongs in a top-tier academic accounting venue.

This skill provides a comprehensive guide for authors submitting applied empirical research in banking and finance. It helps evaluate a manuscript's fit, required framing, methodological rigor, and adherence to house style for target journals like the Journal of Banking and Finance (JBF). It serves as a crucial pre-submission self-check tool, advising on scope, potential weaknesses, and suggesting alternative, more suitable venues.

A comprehensive guide designed to help researchers target specific academic journals, using the Central University of Finance and Economics (CUFE) Journal as a primary example. It provides deep insights into the journal's scope, required structure, common acceptance criteria, and high-risk rejection areas for economics and management manuscripts. This skill helps users frame, revise, and optimize their papers for optimal publication fit.

A specialized tool for researchers aiming to publish in the Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization (JEBO). It helps authors assess the suitability of their behavioral, institutional, or organizational economics manuscript by analyzing the journal's scope, methodological bar, required evidence, and formatting standards. It serves as a pre-submission re-framing and checklist mechanism.

This skill guides authors in assessing whether their economic research is suitable for the Journal of Economic Perspectives (JEP). JEP specializes in publishing accessible, non-technical, and synthetic articles aimed at a broad readership of economists. It helps authors shift their focus from complex empirical estimations to clear exposition, balanced synthesis, and general intellectual framing, providing a comprehensive pre-submission checklist.

A comprehensive tool designed to assess the suitability and positioning of labor economics manuscripts for the Journal of Labor Economics (JOLE). It evaluates the paper's fit, contribution to the field, methodological rigor (such as credible identification strategies on microdata), and structural adherence to top-tier academic publishing standards. Useful for authors refining their research narrative before submission.

This skill guide is designed for researchers and academics submitting manuscripts to specialized journals in economics and management. It helps users analyze a target journal's specific scope, required theoretical perspectives (e.g., institutional economics, political economy), and structural demands. It provides guidance on manuscript revision, identifying high-risk areas for rejection, and suggesting alternative suitable venues.

A comprehensive academic consulting tool designed for authors in management and organizational behavior. It helps researchers assess the suitability of their manuscript for the Journal of Management (JOM). The skill evaluates topic scope, theoretical contribution, methodological rigor (e.g., meta-analysis, SEM), and adherence to top academic publishing standards. It also provides advice on potential rejection risks and suggests alternative top-tier venues.

A comprehensive guide for assessing whether a research manuscript is a good fit for the Journal of Management Studies (JMS). It helps authors structure their work, understand the journal's theory-development focus, and navigate criteria like methodological rigor, theoretical positioning, and house style, ensuring submissions maximize their chance of acceptance in top-tier management venues.