Skill UI

This guide helps researchers structure and articulate strong theoretical contributions for top-tier MIS journals. It details how theory takes different forms—be it a causal behavioral mechanism, a design theory, or an economic model—depending on the specific MIS research tradition, ensuring hypotheses are derived a priori and the IT artifact is load-bearing.

This skill guides authors on how to explicitly identify, frame, and articulate the primary contribution of a Marketing Science manuscript. It forces the transition from merely presenting results to identifying the primary dimension (substantive, modeling, methodological, data, or practice) and translating academic findings into clear, decision-relevant managerial implications. Use this when the 'so what' of the research needs to be sharpened.

A guide for researchers on transforming diverse experimental results into a single, coherent, and highly focused molecular narrative. It teaches the structure required for top-tier molecular biology publications, emphasizing the link between the molecular actor, the proven mechanism, and the physiological consequence. Essential for shifting the focus from a 'catalog of techniques' to a unified, powerful scientific argument.

A comprehensive guide on structuring and writing high-impact scientific summaries, specifically modeled after the standards of journals like Molecular Cell. This skill teaches how to transform raw research findings into a single, polished, unstructured paragraph (~150 words). The summary must explicitly name the molecular mechanism, provide quantified evidence, establish the biological context, and articulate the physiological significance, ensuring the writing is clear for a specialized molecular biology readership.

This guideline assists researchers in structuring complex scientific manuscripts for top-tier journals like Molecular Cell. It details the required components—including Summary, Introduction, Results, Discussion, and STAR Methods—while adhering to strict word counts, display item limits, and narrative flow, ensuring the core scientific mechanism is presented clearly and persuasively.

Provides rigorous guidelines for structuring and writing high-quality academic literature reviews, specifically tailored for journals like Management World. It mandates a unique three-layer dialogue structure (international context, local Chinese research, and original contribution), addressing issues like language source imbalance or lack of scholarly dialogue. Covers precise ratios for Chinese and English sources, and integration with national policy narratives.

A comprehensive guide for researchers targeting Nature Astronomy. This skill helps authors frame their astrophysical or cosmological findings to meet the journal's high standards, emphasizing broad conceptual significance over narrow sub-field advancements. It covers scope fit, structural requirements (e.g., narrative flow, abstract writing), statistical rigor, and common pitfalls like desk-reject triggers, ensuring submissions appeal to a wide, expert audience.

A comprehensive skill designed to help researchers determine if their multidisciplinary, open-access manuscript is suitable for Nature Communications. It guides assessment across journal positioning, scope fit, methodological rigor, evidence standards, and structural requirements, ensuring submissions meet the high bar for cross-disciplinary scientific publications.

This comprehensive guide helps researchers determine if their specialized findings—across agronomy, nutrition, or supply chains—possess the requisite 'food-systems significance' for a high-impact journal. It outlines the required scope, transdisciplinary framing, evidence standards, and structural requirements necessary to shift a specialized result into a broad, systemic narrative suitable for Nature Food.

This comprehensive guide provides authors with deep insight into Nature Immunology's high standards. It covers everything from field-shifting scientific significance and required mechanistic evidence (e.g., in vivo models, scRNA-seq) to specific house styles, abstract structure, and optimal venue selection. Use this skill for pre-submission vetting and improving the conceptual framing of your immunology research.

This guide provides a structured methodology for academic writing, enabling researchers to move beyond stating a mere 'lack of research.' It teaches users how to rigorously pinpoint the theoretical gap—such as an unaddressed mechanism, an inexplicable anomaly, or an undefined boundary condition—that existing theories fail to explain. Essential for strengthening the theoretical depth and academic impact of scholarly papers.

This guide assists researchers in transforming bloated or loosely structured academic manuscripts into the terse, plain IMRAD format required by top-tier journals like NEJM. It focuses on maximizing clarity, enforcing claim-first results based on statistical evidence, curbing over-stated clinical implications, and ensuring the discussion explicitly covers limitations and necessary scope restriction.