Skill UI

This technique is designed for advanced academic research, enabling users to search for theses by running two parallel tracks: a Topic Track (focusing on discipline, methodology, and materials) and a People Track (focusing on university, advisor, degree type, and year). By switching between these two methodologies, users can cross-validate results and significantly improve the accuracy and completeness of their literature review.

A comprehensive intelligence tool designed for clinical researchers to navigate the complex NIH grant landscape. It utilizes a detailed 6-step intake process (covering research idea, career stage, and data status) to perform a multi-faceted positioning analysis. The system maps research to appropriate NIH institutes using RePORTER data and generates an editable Word document containing actionable mechanism recommendations, submission timelines, and strategic guidance for funding applications.

This skill acts as a comprehensive workflow router for manuscripts targeting the American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics (AEJ: Macro). It guides the researcher through the entire publication lifecycle—from initial topic selection and literature positioning, through rigorous quantitative modeling (DSGE, SVAR), empirical identification, writing, to final submission and rebuttal strategy. It ensures the final paper meets the high standards of modern macroeconomics research.

This skill acts as a workflow router, guiding researchers through the entire manuscript lifecycle for submissions to American Economic Journal: Microeconomics (AEJ: Micro). It does not write the paper, but diagnoses the current bottleneck—whether it's topic selection, model refinement, empirical testing, or rebuttal strategy—and specifies which specialized aejmic-* sub-skill to invoke next, ensuring the paper aligns with the specific requirements of AEJ: Micro. Triggered when users are unsure what step to take next, or when revising based on reviewer comments.

A comprehensive guide for researchers submitting papers to applied finance journals. It teaches how to 'red-team' your manuscript by proactively anticipating and strengthening defenses against the four most common fatal objections: lack of interest, inappropriate scope, weak identification, and unstated practical implication. Focuses on framing the contribution and optimizing the cover letter.

A comprehensive guide for refining academic manuscripts, specifically tailored for top-tier accounting journals (e.g., JAR). It instructs authors on restructuring their introductions to immediately front-load the research question, setting, identification strategy, and key findings. It covers advanced academic writing conventions, rigorous signposting, and adherence to specialized house styles.

This guide helps researchers proactively anticipate the critical objections raised by academic journal referees, especially in behavioral economics. It covers key areas such as demand effects, mechanism separation, external validity, and determining proper journal fit, allowing authors to significantly strengthen their drafts before formal submission.

A comprehensive strategy guide designed for researchers submitting papers in institutional or organizational economics. It teaches how to anticipate specialized referee objections—such as selection bias, endogeneity, or scope—before submission, ensuring the manuscript is robustly positioned for top-tier journals.

This guide helps researchers determine if their manuscript is suitable for highly quantitative, theory-driven journals. It emphasizes evaluating the core deliverable—whether it consists of a formal model, provable properties, and an algorithm, rather than relying solely on empirical data or policy recommendations. Essential for optimizing journal submission strategy.

This skill serves as a comprehensive fit and venue-selection tool for submitting accounting manuscripts to the Journal of Accounting Research (JAR). It guides authors through evaluating the paper's empirical rigor, identification strategy, economic framing, and adherence to JAR's high academic standards. Use it when targeting JAR or determining if the research belongs in a top-tier academic accounting venue.

This guide helps authors prepare manuscripts for submission to specialized academic journals by simulating the critiques from various expert subcultures (e.g., decision theorists, experimentalists). It teaches users how to anticipate potential objections, strengthen core arguments, and structure their findings to maximize the likelihood of acceptance.

This guide assists researchers in scoping their academic questions to ensure alignment with specialized journals like Research Policy. It provides detailed criteria for determining if a study focuses on the emergence, diffusion, or governance of innovation systems, rather than purely economic or strategy-focused outcomes. Use it to frame your work to speak directly to innovation scholars and policymakers.