Skill UI

This router is designed to guide authors through the entire, highly structured process of developing and submitting an academic manuscript specifically to the Journal of Accounting Research (JAR). It does not perform the research itself but acts as a decision tool, directing the user to the next most appropriate specialized skill—whether it's refining the core topic, strengthening the economic theory, executing data analysis, or drafting a rebuttal response—ensuring a coherent and high-quality research workflow.

This guide provides a structured protocol for authors writing methods papers in statistics or econometrics. It teaches how to define the precise 'delta' (incremental contribution) of a new method by explicitly referencing 3-6 existing state-of-the-art techniques. It emphasizes positioning the work across both traditional econometric theory and modern machine learning/data science literature, ensuring the contribution is clearly stated against named prior methods, not as a general survey.

This router guides researchers through the entire lifecycle of a manuscript submitted to the Journal of Consumer Psychology (JCP). It helps determine the next necessary step—whether theory development, methods design, data analysis, or rebuttal—ensuring the contribution focuses on a novel psychological mechanism (process) rather than just an observed effect. It acts as a structured roadmap for academic writing and revision.

A comprehensive guide for authors facing a Journal of Consumer Research (JCR) revise-and-resubmit decision. This skill outlines the systematic process of planning major revisions, executing new studies or analyses, ensuring compliance with mandatory data transparency requirements (e.g., OSF deposits, replication code), and drafting a highly structured, point-by-point response letter that satisfies the editor and reviewers.

This comprehensive guide helps academics transform raw financial data observations into rigorous and high-impact research questions suitable for top-tier finance journals. It teaches a structured methodology involving anchoring the core financial mechanism, integrating specific institutional contexts within China, and defining a clear incremental academic contribution.

This guide provides a structured framework for authors responding to academic peer review decisions (R&R or Rejoinder). It transforms scattered reviewer objections into a cohesive, point-by-point revision plan. The process emphasizes engaging fairly with all criticism, strengthening claims with new data or predictions, and openly reconciling conflicting academic viewpoints.

This guide provides a structured framework for authors aiming to submit manuscripts to Nature Geoscience. It details how to comply with strict journal limits on word count, display items, and references. By implementing a triage order—such as moving protocols to Online Methods and extended data to Supplementary Information—authors can ensure the main text remains focused, concise, and impactful.

This guide provides a structured methodology for authors to transform raw scientific data and multiple findings into a single, cohesive, and high-impact narrative, suitable for top-tier journals like Nature Geoscience. It focuses on identifying the single 'headline advance,' structuring the abstract using the 'Here we show' convention, and ensuring the opening paragraphs immediately convey significance to the Earth system.

A comprehensive guide for drafting persuasive and structured author responses to major academic conference reviews. This methodology teaches how to triage critical concerns, anchor answers strictly to submitted evidence (tables, appendices, repository), and effectively counter common technical pushbacks such as baseline tuning, temporal data leakage, and offline-online gaps, ensuring the response is professional, anonymous, and high-impact.

A comprehensive guide for structuring point-by-point responses to reviewers after a major academic review (RED). It emphasizes prioritizing model critiques, quantitative evidence, calibration discipline, and maintaining code/data archive updates. This skill ensures your rebuttal is structured, rigorous, and directly addresses the core concerns of quantitative reviewers.

This skill provides a comprehensive, reproducible rubric for evaluating scholarly and scientific work. It covers nine critical dimensions—including problem statement, methodology, data evidence, analysis rigor, and citation quality—making it ideal for reviewing research papers, grant proposals, literature reviews, and academic theses. Use it to provide structured, actionable, and professional feedback to enhance scholarly output.

This skill establishes a rigorous, verification-first methodology for citing jurisprudence from the ICTY, ICTR, and IRMCT. It mandates multi-level checks (existence, content, paragraph) against authoritative databases (irmct.org, UCR) and sources to ensure legal claims are accurate and non-misrepresentative. It guides users through a structured workflow for high-stakes legal research.