Skill UI

A multi-phase workflow designed to guide users through complex problem analysis and solution design. Instead of providing immediate answers, it systematically enforces deep thinking by reviewing the problem's validity, assessing information gaps, performing root cause analysis, and iterating through solution vetting (self-check and final review). Ideal for complex technical troubleshooting, decision-making, or theoretical discussions requiring rigorous methodology.

This skill generates comprehensive, structured redline edits for Word documents. It captures insertions, deletions, and detailed margin comments, allowing users to conduct professional reviews (legal, copy-editing, technical). The output provides a detailed summary, top-level changes, line-by-line tracking, and clear instructions for applying revisions, ensuring the review process is systematic and actionable.

This skill is designed to review Chinese skill documentation to ensure it meets publishing standards. It systematically checks the clarity of descriptions and the executability of process steps, providing structured feedback in Chinese while maintaining necessary machine enumeration values for technical integrity.

This comprehensive guide outlines the meticulous workflow for preparing a research paper for final publication (Camera-Ready) after acceptance at major NLP conferences like ACL. It covers critical steps including de-anonymization (restoring author details and acknowledgements), integrating mandates from meta-reviews, adding required disclosures (e.g., funding, AI assistance), and ensuring all technical metadata, font embedding, and licensing comply with the permanent open-access standards of the ACL Anthology.

A comprehensive guide for authors preparing the supplementary material for multimedia conferences (e.g., ACM MM). It details how to structure the content, separating core arguments (Body) from supporting evidence (Supplement). Learn best practices for packaging videos, audio, and interactive demos, ensuring technical compatibility (H.264/MP4), maintaining anonymity for double-blind review, and creating a legible, reviewer-friendly submission index.

A comprehensive guide to the rigorous standards for structuring pure mathematics manuscripts, specifically detailing the proper use of appendices and auxiliary material. It teaches authors how to distinguish between the essential core argument (which must remain in the main text) and supplementary technical results, long computations, or background lemmas (which belong in the appendix). This ensures the main text remains focused while maintaining academic rigor and verifiability for peer review.

This guide provides best practices for organizing supplementary material and appendices in major conference submissions. It teaches authors how to maintain the core 11-page body's self-contained integrity while including necessary details (like full configurations, extended result grids, and full proofs) in appendices, ensuring the work remains robust even if reviewers do not read the supplemental content.

A comprehensive preflight checklist for submitting manuscripts to major academic journals (e.g., American Sociological Review) via platforms like Sage Track. This guide ensures authors meet all technical requirements, including proper anonymity masking, adherence to specific word and length counts, proper formatting (ASA Style Guide), and managing required separate title pages, thereby minimizing avoidable desk-rejects and submission errors.

This guide provides a detailed framework for authors to strategically place content within technical conference papers. It outlines the distinct roles of the extended abstract, main body, appendix, and artifact, ensuring that all acceptance-critical information is positioned where reviewers are required to read it. Following these rules maximizes the paper's chances of successful peer review acceptance.

A comprehensive guide for drafting a technical author response (rebuttal) for peer-reviewed academic papers (CAV). It teaches authors how to structure a rebuttal by addressing specific objections related to proof soundness, benchmark fairness, novelty, and scope, using only verifiable evidence, not future promises.

A comprehensive guide for authors preparing a rebuttal response for major academic conferences (like CCS). It teaches strategic communication, focusing on triaging decision-critical issues (threat model, ethics, novelty), structuring arguments by conceding strong points, anchoring claims to existing evidence, and avoiding over-promising. Essential for authors facing adversarial review patterns.

A highly specialized guide for drafting a rebuttal letter following a revise-and-resubmit (R&R) at top-tier economics journals. It provides a structured, point-by-point framework for professionally conceding, refuting, or upgrading evidence in response to highly technical peer reviewer comments (e.g., identification, modern DID, inference).