Skill UI

A comprehensive guide for polishing Developmental Psychology manuscripts. It ensures adherence to APA 7th edition standards, focusing on foregrounding developmental change, using JARS reporting for methods and results, and correctly formatting the Abstract and Public Significance Statement based on the required length tier. It helps authors shift focus from single-age findings to developmental trajectories and mechanisms.

A comprehensive guide for authors addressing the rebuttal window for major NLP/AI conferences (like EACL). It details how to strategically triage reviewer objections, craft responses for both individual reviewers and the action editor's meta-review, plan runnable in-window experiments, and make critical decisions about the paper's future venue.

A comprehensive guide for authors submitting to major AI conferences (like ECAI). It teaches the critical skill of separating core, decision-critical arguments (must be in the main body) from supporting details, proofs, and code (which belong in the optional supplement). This ensures reviewers can fairly judge the contribution despite strict page limits.

This guide provides essential structural advice for authors writing high-impact research papers for top-tier AI conferences. It covers the 'first-page arc,' ensuring the contribution is generalizable (not model-specific), matching evidence types (proofs vs. empirical data) to claims, and maintaining narrative density over a limited page count. Perfect for researchers preparing submissions.

A detailed guide for modeling the complete academic peer-review lifecycle, specifically tailored to the ECCV conference structure. It covers the timeline from submission through rebuttal and AC discussion to final decision, detailing critical points such as co-author enforcement regimes, LLM policy adherence, panel reviewer composition, and strategic points influencing the final outcome. Essential for researchers targeting top-tier vision conferences.

A comprehensive guide for structuring the introduction and related-work section of academic manuscripts, specifically tailored for journals like The Economic Journal (EJ). It teaches authors how to effectively position their research contribution for a broad, generalist economic readership, moving beyond niche citations to articulate the general economic question, the gap in knowledge, and the paper's wide-ranging relevance.

This comprehensive guide structures the process for authors responding to reviewers' reports (R&R) from top-tier academic journals. It provides a step-by-step plan for drafting the response letter, ensuring a respectful, evidence-based tone, and systematically addressing all major concerns regarding economic mechanism, identification, and broad relevance. It emphasizes strategic negotiation and structural rigor.

This tool helps authors conduct a pre-mortem review before submitting manuscripts to demanding general-interest journals. It guides the identification and pre-emption of likely objections—such as lack of broad interest, missing economic mechanism, or identification threats—allowing authors to proactively harden their argument, structure their contribution, and greatly increase the paper's chances of acceptance.

A comprehensive guide for authors preparing manuscripts for submission to The Economic Journal (EJ). It covers format requirements, single-blind review guidelines, author-date referencing, JEL codes, data/code policy (Zenodo), and the detailed submission process via Editorial Express. Use this checklist for the final mechanical gate check before submission.

A comprehensive framework for evaluating preliminary economic research ideas against the standards of top-tier journals, such as The Economic Journal (EJ). This tool helps researchers determine if their findings possess broad intellectual appeal, substantial contribution, and a clear economic mechanism, guiding decisions on scope, format (full-length vs. short-paper), and appropriate academic outlet. It is crucial for moving beyond niche results toward widely impactful scholarship.

A comprehensive guide for polishing advanced academic drafts, particularly for top-tier economics journals. It focuses on transforming technical prose into clear, generalist-legible writing by restructuring the argument, leading with economic intuition, and adhering to strict house style conventions. Ideal for the late-stage polish phase when the core research is complete.

A comprehensive skill tool designed to guide authors on submitting manuscripts to *Economic Perspectives*. It helps users evaluate if their work meets the journal's high standards for theoretical depth, economic mechanism explanation, and scholarly rigor. It covers structure, scope, and common rejection pitfalls, serving as a pre-submission quality check.