Skill UI

This guide provides detailed rules for structuring supplementary material (technical appendices, code/data ZIPs, multimedia) for AAAI submissions. It emphasizes that core contributions and essential evidence must reside in the main paper, while appendices should only deepen the argument. It covers guidelines for maintaining double-blind anonymity, ensuring immutability, and achieving reproducibility.

A comprehensive guide for authors transitioning an accepted, anonymous conference submission into the final, public camera-ready version for publication. It covers de-anonymization steps, including restoring author details, updating proceedings metadata, reflowing figures for multiagent papers, and integrating rebuttal promises without expanding the core contribution. This ensures adherence to strict publishing standards.

Provides comprehensive guidelines on structuring academic manuscripts for Acta Automatica Sinica (AAS). Learn how to effectively separate core contributions (main text) from supporting details, such as lengthy proofs, supplementary simulations, and extensive datasets, ensuring the paper remains concise and highly readable while maintaining scientific completeness for reviewers.

This guide helps authors tailor their manuscript to fit the specific page budget of Advanced Materials, whether it is classified as a Communication or a full Research Article. It details how to manage the length budget by coordinating text and visual display items (figures, tables) against the journal's strict typesetting page limits, ensuring the core scientific evidence remains intact while removing padding and secondary data.

This guide teaches authors how to structure scientific manuscripts by correctly partitioning core findings, decisive evidence, and the main narrative into the body text, while moving exhaustive datasets, full protocols, and secondary characterization into the Supporting Information (SI). It ensures the main paper is stand-alone and convincing.

This guide helps revise the prose, abstract, and introduction of applied economics manuscripts to conform to the high standards of AEJ: Applied. It teaches how to structure the paper by leading with the core finding and ensuring the economic question is clear in the first paragraph, transforming technical drafts into highly legible, journal-ready exposition.

This skill guides researchers on how to triage numerous robustness checks for short-format academic manuscripts (e.g., AER: Insights) constrained by word and exhibit limits. It teaches the 'minimum credible set' approach: identifying the 1-2 core checks that defend the central hypothesis for the main text, while systematically moving all supplementary checks to the Appendix and properly signposting them in one sentence to maintain credibility.

This guide helps researchers assess whether their complex project contains a single, crisp, general-interest insight suitable for short-format academic journals. It provides a rigorous framework to filter out multi-result papers, ensuring the core contribution is publishable, significant, and self-contained.

This comprehensive guide provides best practices for structuring appendices and supplementary materials for high-level academic journals. It helps authors manage the balance between main text conciseness and academic completeness by clearly defining what belongs in the core narrative (main findings) versus what should be reserved for the supplementary section (detailed proofs, extended experiments, raw data, and multimedia).

This skill guides authors on how to position their manuscript within the complex, multidisciplinary literature of Agricultural Systems (AgSy). It ensures that the paper advances the conversation by engaging both the domain knowledge and the core modeling/systems methodologies. The process focuses on identifying unresolved systemic trade-offs, pinpointing the exact research gap, and clearly articulating the unique contribution among established alternatives.

An essential orchestrator for authors submitting manuscripts to Agricultural Systems. This tool guides users through the entire academic writing lifecycle, helping them determine the appropriate article type (e.g., Review, Perspective) and ensuring the core research question addresses true systems complexity, interactions, and trade-offs, rather than single-factor trials. It maps the manuscript stage to the necessary sub-skills.

This skill provides architectural guidance for writing high-level academic history articles, specifically tailored for the American Historical Review (AHR). It helps writers ensure that the narrative development and the core historical argument are seamlessly interwoven, adhering to strict length and scholarly standards. Use it when outlining complex drafts or restructuring material that feels disjointed.