Skill UI

Enforces a verification-first routine: identify the proving command, rerun it fully, inspect the output, and cite its evidence before claiming tests, builds, or tasks are complete; keeps handoffs honest and avoids false satisfaction.

This guide teaches targeted verification strategies for historical research. When initial searches suggest a candidate name or figure, do not continue with broad searches. Instead, immediately switch to verifying the candidate against all specific constraints (time period, location, family details, major events) using precise search queries to confirm identity and eliminate false positives.

A comprehensive guide for authors submitting revisions to top-tier academic journals, such as AJPS. It details the strategy, structure, and specific constraints required for the response memorandum following a Revise & Resubmit (R&R) decision. The guide emphasizes addressing every reviewer comment, reconciling conflicting demands, maintaining double-blind anonymity, and ensuring all new analyses are fully reproducible for third-party verification.

This guide details the multi-stage, rigorous review process for the American Journal of Political Science (AJPS). It covers the mechanics of double-blind screening, editorial fit assessment, expert peer review, and the unique, critical post-acceptance third-party verification step. It is designed to help authors anticipate and mitigate potential rejection issues by structuring and refining their manuscripts to meet top-tier academic standards.

This guide provides best practices for structuring complex academic manuscripts, particularly for conferences requiring a single-PDF submission model. It details how to optimally split content between the limited body (e.g., 12 pages) and the extensive appendix, ensuring that the crucial theorems, proofs, and auxiliary lemmas are presented in a verifiable and highly readable manner for peer reviewers. Key techniques include implementing restatement discipline and writing roadmap paragraphs for clear verification paths.

A comprehensive project management framework for authors submitting theoretical papers to major conferences (e.g., COLT). This guide outlines the entire lifecycle, emphasizing backward planning from the deadline, milestone setting (Result Freeze, Verification Pass), and critical quality checks, including proof assembly, anonymity sweeps, and rebuttal response. It is designed to mitigate common academic writing risks and ensure a robust submission process.

This guide provides a detailed walkthrough of the rigorous review process at International Organizations (IO). It covers aspects like double-blind peer review, specialized expert assessment, and the distinctive verification stage where quantitative results and formal proofs are re-run. Use this to pre-empt potential failure modes and structure your manuscript for maximum impact before submission.

This guide details best practices for structuring supplementary material in highly technical academic submissions (e.g., STOC). It teaches authors how to design an appendix that facilitates selective verification by reviewers, ensuring that complex proofs, deferred results, and extended discussions are navigable. Key techniques include optimizing the Table of Contents, maintaining strict pointer discipline, and distinguishing between material required for core understanding versus material saved for the full version.

This skill provides a rigorous, verification-first methodology for all research concerning the Special Criminal Court (CPS) of the Central African Republic. It details the proper steps, fallback sources, and foundational legal texts required to cite judgments, decisions, and procedural documents accurately, ensuring compliance with international criminal justice standards and proper citation protocol.

This skill establishes a rigorous, verification-first methodology for citing jurisprudence from the ICTY, ICTR, and IRMCT. It mandates multi-level checks (existence, content, paragraph) against authoritative databases (irmct.org, UCR) and sources to ensure legal claims are accurate and non-misrepresentative. It guides users through a structured workflow for high-stakes legal research.

This skill provides a rigorous, multi-stage framework for handling all outputs related to the Jurisdicción Especial para la Paz (JEP), Colombia's key transitional justice tribunal. It mandates a strict citation verification process, requiring all legal claims and citations to be cross-referenced against the official jep.gov.co website. It guides users through the complex legal structure, different case types, and the unique restorative justice model derived from the 2016 Final Peace Agreement.