Skill UI

Utilizes structured critical reasoning to rigorously stress-test ideas, plans, and decisions. This skill allows you to play devil's advocate, conduct pre-mortems, execute red-teaming exercises, or audit underlying assumptions. It employs multiple advanced modes, including Socratic questioning, Hegelian dialectics, and Falsificationism, to identify blind spots, weaknesses, and unstated assumptions before commitment.

A comprehensive framework for high-stakes negotiation, drawing from tactical empathy and behavioral science. It teaches users how to move beyond logical arguments by understanding the emotional drivers and underlying needs of the counterpart. Techniques include tactical empathy, mirroring, calibrated questioning, and accusation audits. Ideal for salary negotiations, contract discussions, sales objections, and difficult conversations, ensuring you uncover hidden information and build genuine rapport to achieve better outcomes.

A powerful cognitive tool that moves beyond surface-level brainstorming. It forces users to systematically deconstruct complex problems down to their 'irreducible truths.' The skill identifies 8-12 hidden assumptions (Surface, Middle, Deep), classifies them (Fact, Convention, Belief, Interest-Driven), and ranks them by Fragility × Impact. This process allows users to stress-test their premises and rebuild conclusions based only on verified realities, making it invaluable for major life decisions or business hypothesis testing.

This skill acts as a global LinkedIn strategist, helping professionals transform basic CVs and profiles into top 1% authority accounts. It performs deep audits on headlines, 'About' sections, and experience, enhancing SEO, solving brand confusion, and providing actionable strategies for career and business growth.

This comprehensive, guided 4-phase workflow helps teams establish clear identity, boundaries, and strategic positioning. It guides users through absorbing existing context, auditing current capabilities versus claimed responsibilities, articulating a defined mission, and finally achieving stakeholder alignment. Use this framework when starting a new role, inheriting ambiguity, or needing to define clear operational boundaries.

A meta-orchestrator designed for compliance teams to manage complex, multi-jurisdictional compliance programs. It automatically selects applicable regulatory frameworks (e.g., ISO 27001, GDPR, EU AI Act, HIPAA), computes control overlap across standards, simulates mock audits, and consolidates evidence into a unified reuse map. Ideal for planning annual audits or achieving multi-certification.

Generates a comprehensive, prioritized compliance checklist for major frameworks like GDPR, SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, and more. This tool performs detailed gap analysis, identifies quick wins, and structures a phased implementation roadmap, making it essential for audit preparation and maintaining regulatory adherence.

This guide provides a comprehensive pre-submission audit checklist for AAAI conference technical papers. It covers crucial aspects like double-blind anonymity, page limits, reproducibility requirements, author policies, and adherence to the latest AI-use guidelines. Use this before submitting to mitigate risks of desk rejection or policy violation.

A comprehensive audit checklist for authors submitting papers to major NLP conferences (like ACL) via OpenReview. This guide covers mandatory formatting rules, maintaining anonymity, addressing ethical declarations (Responsible NLP), managing resubmission links, and ensuring adherence to the entire submission workflow to prevent desk rejection.

This guide teaches researchers how to structure a high-impact literature review for top-tier academic journals. It moves beyond merely summarizing recent empirical studies, focusing instead on establishing a deep theoretical lineage (e.g., earnings quality, audit theory), identifying specific, non-obvious research gaps, and clearly positioning the current study's unique contribution within the established academic discourse.

This guide assists researchers in structuring and presenting academic evidence for top-tier journals like ASQ. It provides best practices for both qualitative (establishing transparent data-to-theory links, coding transparency) and quantitative (ensuring robust mechanism testing and alternative explanation checks) analyses. It ensures all theoretical claims are auditable and fully supported by the raw data.

This skill provides expert guidance on evaluating academic manuscripts, particularly those in auditing, accounting, and economics. It helps users determine the suitability of their work for specific, high-level journals (e.g., Auditing and Economics Research). It covers journal positioning, required methodology, structural requirements, common rejection pitfalls, and strategic advice for revision or resubmission.