Skill UI

This guide details how to elevate localized or descriptive agricultural findings into general scientific contributions suitable for high-impact journals. It teaches authors how to identify unresolved biophysical gaps, connect results to broad crop-yield mechanisms, and structure their introduction to prove general relevance rather than merely reporting local data.

This guide provides expert recommendations on organizing supplementary material for academic papers. It teaches authors how to distinguish between load-bearing evidence (for the main text) and reassuring, secondary data (for the internet appendix). Proper indexing, cross-referencing, and material triage are critical for creating a lean, navigable, and highly persuasive manuscript.

This guide provides a deep dive into the rigorous FOCS (Foundations of Computer Science) review process. It models the entire academic pipeline—from initial assignment and expert consultation to committee discussion and final decision—allowing authors to predict how their work will be evaluated based on correctness, novelty, and overall field contribution in a double-blind setting.

A comprehensive audit checklist and guide for authors submitting academic papers to top-tier conferences like FOCS. It covers critical aspects including formatting standards (11pt, single-column), metadata integrity (double-blind checks), technical pre-flight checks (unencrypted PDF, no author leakage), and adherence to complex publication policies (IEEE/SIGACT). Essential for ensuring submission readiness.

A comprehensive guide detailing the structure and content required for responding to academic peer reviews. It distinguishes between the initial rebuttal and the complex Major Revision response letter. Key focus areas include maintaining double-anonymity, systematically tracking every reviewer request, providing concrete evidence, and addressing methodological concerns like soundness and external validity.

This guide details the rigorous, journal-style review process for FSE submissions. It covers double-anonymous review, the three-reviewer program committee model, and the significance of Major Revision as a full revise-and-resubmit round. It helps authors understand how to strategically strengthen their work by addressing structural vs. revisable gaps, maximizing their chances of acceptance, and differentiating FSE's process from other conferences.

A comprehensive guide for academics on structuring and articulating the core, novel contribution of a scholarly paper, particularly in specialized fields like Game Theory and Economic Behavior. It provides a framework for crafting a single, highly impactful 'contribution sentence' and organizing the claim cascade (Headline, Why Open, Key Idea), ensuring the theoretical advance is immediately legible to specialized editors and reviewers.

This skill guides the polishing of prose, abstract, and introduction for manuscripts intended for Games and Economic Behavior (GEB). It enforces a rigorous, idea-first writing style, ensuring the work is highly readable for a broad, multi-disciplinary academic audience (including economics, CS, and biology). Key guidelines include maintaining an abstract under 250 words, structuring the introduction around the core question and result, and motivating formal arguments with clear prose.

This guide helps researchers translate academic findings into rigorous, evidence-grounded implications for policy, governance, and practice concerning global environmental change. It stresses that implications must be specific (naming actors and levers), honest about scope and uncertainty, and directly traceable to the study's results, avoiding generic overstatements.

This guide details the rigorous evaluation process used by Global Environmental Change (GEC) for manuscripts, including double-anonymized review, initial editorial screening for scope and social-science fit, and the role of interdisciplinary external reviewers. It provides critical insights into common rejection pitfalls and actionable advice on how to structure a paper to maximize its chances of acceptance in academic publishing.

This guide ensures that manuscripts for Global Environmental Change (GEC) are rigorous and highly readable for an interdisciplinary, policy-relevant audience. It focuses on polishing prose, front-loading contributions, minimizing jargon, and structuring discussions to meet strict word and abstract caps, ensuring clarity across environmental science, governance, and policy domains.

This comprehensive skill assists authors in determining if their Earth or space science manuscript is suitable for Geophysical Research Letters (GRL). It provides detailed guidelines covering journal positioning, required scope (atmosphere, ocean, solid earth, etc.), the method and evidence bar, strict house style rules (brevity, structure, figures), and a final pre-submission checklist. It is designed to help authors re-frame and maximize the impact of single, highly significant findings.