Skill UI

An adaptive and persistent coaching system designed for the entire job search lifecycle. It covers critical stages including Job Description (JD) decoding, resume optimization, mock interviews (behavioral, technical, case), transcript analysis, storybank building, and comprehensive salary negotiation support. The system tracks your progress and provides tailored coaching plans across 23 commands.

This technique guides users in solving trivia or puzzle questions where the target band's country is not explicitly named. Instead, the country is hinted at through indirect geographic clues such as land area ranges, EU membership dates, or national flag descriptions. It emphasizes systematic deduction, requiring the user to treat the clue as a multi-candidate puzzle and test all viable countries before refining the search to the specific band name.

This comprehensive guide provides structured frameworks and best practices for all developer advocacy activities. Use it to plan conference talks (including CFP templates), prepare live coding demos with the 10-3-1 rule, and strategize for podcast appearances and building in public. It covers everything from audience context to presentation polish.

A comprehensive guide for authors facing a revise-and-resubmit (R&R) status in academic journals. It outlines the entire revision lifecycle, from building a structured response matrix and performing substantive re-analysis (re-coding, new experiments) to strategically drafting the point-by-point rebuttal letter. Focuses on maintaining academic rigor, reconciling conflicting reviews, and ensuring methodological consistency before final resubmission.

This guide assists researchers in structuring and presenting academic evidence for top-tier journals like ASQ. It provides best practices for both qualitative (establishing transparent data-to-theory links, coding transparency) and quantitative (ensuring robust mechanism testing and alternative explanation checks) analyses. It ensures all theoretical claims are auditable and fully supported by the raw data.

This guide provides a deep dive into the rigorous FOCS (Foundations of Computer Science) review process. It models the entire academic pipeline—from initial assignment and expert consultation to committee discussion and final decision—allowing authors to predict how their work will be evaluated based on correctness, novelty, and overall field contribution in a double-blind setting.

This comprehensive guide details the end-to-end technical program committee (TPC) review process for major academic conferences like INTERSPEECH. It walks through every stage—from initial submission and area assignment to independent review, rebuttal, meta-review, and final decision. Users can learn how to decode reviewer feedback, understand the limitations of the rebuttal, and develop a strategic plan for future submissions and research refinement.

A comprehensive protocol for authors responding to major/minor revisions or rejection decisions from specialized academic journals, such as JPubE. It guides the structured process of decoding editor feedback, classifying comments (fundamental, clarification, disagreement), performing necessary analyses, and writing a professional, evidence-based point-by-point response letter. Essential for improving scholarly communication in public economics.

A comprehensive guide for revising visualization research papers for top-tier conferences and journals (e.g., IEEE VIS/TVCG). It mandates shifting focus from aesthetic design to rigorous, task-grounded contributions. Users learn how to justify every visual encoding and interaction based on the analytical task, ensure evaluation methods match the contribution type, and structure the narrative around the data-task problem.