Skill UI

This skill produces comprehensive 360-degree feedback instruments or structured performance reports. It guides users through collecting multi-rater input across core competencies like leadership, communication, and execution. Ideal for performance reviews, professional development planning, and assessing employee impact. The output adheres to best practices, ensuring development-oriented and behaviorally anchored feedback.

This skill facilitates the design of comprehensive employee engagement surveys (e.g., annual, pulse, exit) and provides a structured framework for analyzing the results. It guides users through creating key sections like eNPS, culture metrics, and growth opportunities, culminating in actionable plans and communication templates for HR professionals.

Provides a comprehensive, structured guide for managing redundancy processes, covering both individual and collective consultations. It includes templates for at-risk letters, consultation meeting scripts, and final confirmation letters. The content is heavily focused on UK employment law, and repeatedly emphasizes that qualified legal and HR advice must be sought before any action is taken.

This comprehensive guide provides structured frameworks and best practices for all developer advocacy activities. Use it to plan conference talks (including CFP templates), prepare live coding demos with the 10-3-1 rule, and strategize for podcast appearances and building in public. It covers everything from audience context to presentation polish.

This comprehensive single-page template guides new hires through their first week. It integrates the welcome message, detailed 5-day schedule, key contacts (Manager/Buddy), necessary equipment checklist, and structured learning tracks. It ensures new employees understand their immediate journey and completion standards upon joining.

A comprehensive guide for preparing accepted research papers for final submission to major conferences (e.g., AAAI Press). This process covers strict template adherence, deanonymization of author details, managing copyright transfer, optimizing page counts (including purchasing extra technical pages), and ensuring all source files (LaTeX/Word, figures, bibliography) are correctly formatted for professional publication.

A highly specialized guide for drafting a rebuttal letter following a revise-and-resubmit (R&R) at top-tier economics journals. It provides a structured, point-by-point framework for professionally conceding, refuting, or upgrading evidence in response to highly technical peer reviewer comments (e.g., identification, modern DID, inference).

A specialized tool designed to guide authors in drafting professional and structured rebuttal letters for academic journals, particularly those in Public Administration. It provides detailed templates and guidance for addressing reviewer comments, focusing specifically on strengthening theoretical frameworks and justifying methodological fits to meet high academic standards.

A specialized skill designed to guide the creation of high-quality, structured abstracts for top-tier academic journals, particularly adhering to the standards of the Economic Research Journal (ERJ). It provides detailed templates for the five-sentence Chinese summary and the five-element English summary, ensuring academic rigor, quantifiable results, and avoiding common, empty filler phrases.

A comprehensive guide detailing the transition of an accepted FSE paper into a journal-ready (PACMSE) camera-ready format. This process involves critical steps including full de-anonymization, applying the final ACM template, completing detailed journal metadata (ORCID, CCS), integrating required revisions, and permanentizing open science artifacts with DOIs.

This guide outlines the critical steps required after an academic paper has been accepted at a major conference. It details the process of converting an anonymous submission into the final, camera-ready version for publication in the ACM Digital Library. Key steps include de-anonymization (restoring author details, affiliations, and funding), completing ACM rights forms and metadata (ORCIDs, CCS), verifying the final layout integrity after template changes, and confirming presentation obligations.

This guide details the comprehensive steps required after an ACM conference paper has been accepted. It covers critical stages including obtaining shepherd approval, de-anonymizing the work (restoring author names, funding, and system details), reflowing the paper using the acmart template, and submitting both the source code and the final PDF through the ACM Publishing System (TAPS). It emphasizes releasing public artifacts for reproducibility.