Skill UI

This comprehensive guide polishes academic manuscripts for top-tier economics journals. It focuses on refining rhetoric by eliminating vague, empty-significance phrases and improving policy recommendations. The skill helps authors transition from mere statistical reporting to articulating clear economic implications, ensuring consistency in tense, person, and terminology.

Comprehensive guide for converting an accepted academic paper into the final camera-ready version for IEEE proceedings. It details crucial post-acceptance steps, including working through the shepherd's concern ledger, mandatory inclusion of the ethics section, de-anonymizing sensitive technical details (like vendor names and CVEs), and adhering to strict IEEE formatting and submission mechanics. Essential for authors finalizing submissions.

A comprehensive guide for authors submitting to top-tier security conferences (e.g., IEEE S&P). It details best practices for constructing the 'Related Work' section, focusing on defining a clear 'security delta' statement, mapping coverage across multiple attack vectors, managing resubmission overlaps (40% rule), and verifying citation attribution using tools like dblp and IEEE Xplore.

A comprehensive guide detailing the review journey for the INFORMS Journal on Computing (IJOC). It outlines key gates, including the Area-Editor suitability check and single-blind refereeing, and provides strategies for interpreting decisions (reject, major/minor revision). This resource helps authors plan their submissions, triage feedback, and determine if a sibling journal is a better fit.

This comprehensive guide provides a step-by-step checklist for authors transitioning from an anonymous conference submission to a final, polished, camera-ready manuscript. It covers de-anonymization (restoring author details), integrating meta-review critiques, ensuring compliance with major publishers (like IEEE eCF/PDF-eXpress), and preparing supporting public artifacts, making it essential for academic publication success.

A comprehensive guide for revising technical papers, specifically tailored for submission to top-tier robotics conferences like IROS. It teaches how to restructure narratives from 'demo-speak' to quantitative, evidence-based claims, focusing on a task-first opening, integrated system description, and mandatory figure-first presentation within strict page budgets.

A comprehensive guide for planning and drafting responses to major revisions (R&R) in Information Systems research. It teaches systematic prioritization, focusing first on the Senior Editor's concerns, addressing genre-specific reviewer critiques (e.g., proofs, identification, evaluation), and structuring the response using an electronic companion for maximum impact.

This guide provides a comprehensive deep dive into the multi-stage peer review process for academic submissions, detailing the roles of EIC, Senior Editor, and Associate Editor. It teaches users how to correctly interpret complex decision letters, distinguish between fundamental contribution gaps and minor execution issues, and structure a preparatory ledger to set realistic expectations for revision rounds.

This guide outlines the critical steps required after an academic paper has been accepted at a major conference. It details the process of converting an anonymous submission into the final, camera-ready version for publication in the ACM Digital Library. Key steps include de-anonymization (restoring author details, affiliations, and funding), completing ACM rights forms and metadata (ORCIDs, CCS), verifying the final layout integrity after template changes, and confirming presentation obligations.

This comprehensive guide details the rigorous process of transforming a submitted ITCS paper into the final, open-access LIPIcs camera-ready version. It covers critical steps including switching to the required `lipics-v2021` LaTeX class, fully re-attributing author identity (names, ORCIDs, funding), completing structured metadata (ACM CCS, keywords), incorporating reviewer-suggested fixes, and ensuring compliance with strict production standards set by the Dagstuhl editorial office.

This guide details the highly selective, multi-stage review process for a prestigious academic journal. It covers editorial pre-screening, double-blind peer review, expected timelines, and common pitfalls. Use this resource to stress-test your manuscript, understand field significance, and set realistic expectations before submitting your work.

A comprehensive guide for structuring and drafting the editor-facing cover letter when submitting a manuscript to the Journal of the American Chemical Society (JACS). It instructs authors on how to clearly articulate the research advance, broad intellectual interest, and suitability (fit) for the journal, serving as a strategic pitch rather than a repetition of the abstract.