Skill UI

Plan an AAAI conference submission end to end: venue fit, abstract and paper deadlines, anonymized PDF and checklist, two-phase review, rebuttal, decision, camera-ready, registration and artifact release. Includes backward-planning gates, a Phase-1 readiness check, risk register and owner map.

A comprehensive project management guide for submitting academic papers to the AAMAS conference. It details all critical milestones, including venue fit, evidence locking, abstract submission, double-blind review, rebuttal, and final camera-ready preparation. Essential for managing complex research involving game theory and multi-agent systems.

This comprehensive guide provides authors with a detailed checklist for the post-acceptance, camera-ready phase for Acta Automatica Sinica (AAS). It walks users through all necessary steps, including restoring full author details, applying the specific journal template, meticulous proofreading of formulas, figures, and references (GB/T 7714), and understanding publication and royalty procedures. Use this to ensure your manuscript is zero-defect before publication.

Plan an ACL paper across ACL Rolling Review cycles: choose a cycle against conference commitment windows, backward-plan from the ARR deadline, track review, response and meta-review timing, decide commitment, loop resubmissions, and reach camera-ready and ACL Anthology publication.

This comprehensive guide outlines the critical steps authors must take after their manuscript has been accepted by a journal. It guides users through the transition from academic writing to scientific publishing quality control, covering copyright agreements, mandatory metadata filling (e.g., funding, affiliations), rigorous formatting checks (references, formulas, figures), and the multi-stage proofreading (proofsheet) process to ensure zero-defect publication.

This guide details the critical steps required after conference acceptance to prepare a paper for the final, public 'camera-ready' submission (e.g., AISTATS, PMLR). It covers transforming an anonymous manuscript into the final two-column format, restoring author metadata, handling public artifacts (code, data), resolving formatting issues, and confirming all presentation and copyright obligations.

A comprehensive project management guide for the entire academic lifecycle of submitting a paper to a top-tier conference like AISTATS. It maps all crucial milestones—from initial venue fit and evidence freezing to abstract submission, review discussion, and final camera-ready publication—providing backward-planning heuristics and risk assessment to ensure timely and high-quality submissions.

This guide outlines the rigorous, multi-stage workflow required to convert a conference acceptance or major revision into a final, publishable ACM-formatted paper. It covers critical steps including de-anonymization (restoring author details and citations), completing ACM rights forms, integrating archived artifacts, and managing the strict six-week timeline. Essential reading for authors ensuring their work meets high-quality publishing standards.

A comprehensive guide for preparing the final, camera-ready version of a conference paper for top-tier venues like ACM SIGOPS ATC. This process goes beyond mere formatting, requiring the integration of all shepherd-mandated revisions, systematic de-anonymization (restoring authors, systems, and links), completing ACM Open Access metadata, and passing rigorous production checks for publication in the ACM Digital Library.

A comprehensive guide detailing the end-to-end workflow for submitting research papers to top-tier academic conferences, such as the ACM SIGOPS ATC. It provides a backward planning structure, covering critical stages from initial system freezing and extended abstract writing, through multi-round peer review, rebuttal preparation, artifact evaluation, and final camera-ready submission.

This comprehensive guide outlines the critical steps for authors preparing accepted papers for camera-ready publication in the Springer LNCS open-access format. It details the process of de-anonymizing the manuscript, completing essential Springer metadata (ORCID, author order), integrating reviewer feedback, and making all research artifacts permanent using DOIs. Following this checklist is crucial for successful publication.

Use this comprehensive guide to manage the entire project lifecycle for a CAV (Computer Aided Verification) paper submission. It provides a backward-planning timeline, covering topics from initial concept fitting and evidence locking to the two-stage review process, optional artifact evaluation, and final camera-ready submission. Essential for managing technical academic deadlines and mitigating common failure modes.