Skill UI

This skill guides users through the complex, year-long project lifecycle required for submitting a paper to a top-tier academic conference like SIGCOMM. It outlines key milestones, from initial venue fit and evidence locking to abstract submission, review response, and final camera-ready artifact presentation, ensuring adherence to the single annual deadline.

A detailed guide for managing the entire academic paper submission process for major graphics conferences like SIGGRAPH and SIGGRAPH Asia. It outlines the two annual cycles, backward planning from deadlines, key milestones (results video, baselines), rebuttal strategies, and final camera-ready submission steps, ensuring researchers can manage complex timelines effectively.

This guide details the critical 'triage protocol' for structuring academic papers for highly constrained venues like SIGIR. It outlines the three-container model (Paper Body, References, Repository) and provides expert advice on prioritizing review-critical evidence, implementing effective content compression techniques, and managing external repository material to ensure submissions meet strict page budgets without sacrificing soundness or review quality. Essential reading for researchers.

A comprehensive guide designed for planning major academic conference submissions (e.g., SIGIR). It provides a detailed backward-planning calendar, mapping milestones from initial scoping and evidence building through to final camera-ready submission and presentation. This tool helps researchers manage complex multi-track coordination, identify potential failure modes, and utilize fallback conference pathways.

This guide details the critical post-acceptance process for SIGMOD papers, transitioning the work from a conference submission template to the final PACMMOD journal format. It covers complex technical porting, de-anonymization (restoring author names, funding, etc.), managing metadata submission (ORCID, rights forms), and publishing the associated digital artifact for reproducibility.

A comprehensive audit guide for preparing academic papers for the SOSP conference. This checklist details critical compliance points, including strict deadlines (abstract registration and full paper upload), strict formatting rules (12-page limit, two-column layout), robust anonymization techniques, and conflict declaration best practices. Use this before uploading any material to ensure high quality and avoid desk rejection.

This comprehensive guide provides a backward-planning workflow for submissions to the TACAS conference. It meticulously details the entire academic publishing lifecycle, from initial category selection and evidence locking to mandatory tool artifact submission, rebuttal, and camera-ready preparation. It is tailored for understanding the unique single annual review cycle and parallel tool/paper review structure.

A comprehensive project management layer designed for navigating the entire academic conference lifecycle. It guides authors through critical phases, including topic selection, paper drafting, rigorous review response, camera-ready submission, and final presentation. The workflow emphasizes meticulous planning, role assignment, and maintaining academic integrity to prevent common project failures.

This comprehensive guide manages the end-to-end project lifecycle for submitting a systems paper to the UIST conference. It structures the demanding timeline, detailing milestones from abstract submission and hardware development to video production, rebuttal, and final camera-ready submission, while also providing crucial risk mitigation strategies.

A comprehensive project management guide for submitting academic papers, specifically tailored for the IEEE VIS conference cycle. It maps out all critical milestones, from initial area selection and abstract submission through to conditional acceptance revisions and final camera-ready preparation. Use this skill to responsibly plan for the annual cycle, manage reviewers' expectations, and mitigate common submission risks.

A comprehensive guide for authors submitting to academic conferences, addressing strict page limitations where appendices count against the core budget. It details best practices for distributing supplementary evidence across three external homes: the main paper, dedicated arXiv technical reports, and artifact repositories. The guide emphasizes maintaining self-containment, managing version discipline, and strategically cutting content to ensure the core claims are reviewable.

A comprehensive guide for transforming an accepted, anonymous conference paper into the final, public version of record for WACV. It covers critical steps including de-anonymization, incorporating final revisions, ensuring dual publication compliance (IEEE Xplore & CVF), fulfilling data/code release obligations, and preparing the presentation material.