Skill UI

Audit Google Meet attendance by listing recent conferences, participants, and session durations using the `gws meet` commands to confirm who joined and for how long.

A comprehensive project management guide for submitting academic papers to the AAMAS conference. It details all critical milestones, including venue fit, evidence locking, abstract submission, double-blind review, rebuttal, and final camera-ready preparation. Essential for managing complex research involving game theory and multi-agent systems.

This comprehensive guide provides authors with a detailed audit checklist for preparing submissions for major AI conferences like AISTATS. It covers critical pre-submission requirements, including maintaining double-blind anonymity, adhering to strict page limits, managing OpenReview details, and ensuring reproducibility. Use this checklist before the abstract or full-paper deadline to mitigate desk-reject risks.

A comprehensive project management guide for the entire academic lifecycle of submitting a paper to a top-tier conference like AISTATS. It maps all crucial milestones—from initial venue fit and evidence freezing to abstract submission, review discussion, and final camera-ready publication—providing backward-planning heuristics and risk assessment to ensure timely and high-quality submissions.

This comprehensive guide provides an audit checklist for authors preparing submissions for major technical conferences like ATC/SIGOPS. It details critical requirements, including formatting for the paired extended abstract and full paper, adherence to strict page budgets, and essential steps for maintaining double-blind anonymity. Use this checklist before final submission to avoid common pitfalls and ensure readiness for the review process.

A comprehensive guide detailing the end-to-end workflow for submitting research papers to top-tier academic conferences, such as the ACM SIGOPS ATC. It provides a backward planning structure, covering critical stages from initial system freezing and extended abstract writing, through multi-round peer review, rebuttal preparation, artifact evaluation, and final camera-ready submission.

Use this comprehensive guide to manage the entire project lifecycle for a CAV (Computer Aided Verification) paper submission. It provides a backward-planning timeline, covering topics from initial concept fitting and evidence locking to the two-stage review process, optional artifact evaluation, and final camera-ready submission. Essential for managing technical academic deadlines and mitigating common failure modes.

This tool models the comprehensive, multi-stage academic review pipeline used by CoRL (Conference on Robot Learning). It simulates the entire double-anonymous review process, including reviewer assignment, initial first-round rejection gates, the critical author rebuttal window, and the multi-tiered decision-making hierarchy (Reviewers -> ACs -> SACs). It helps authors understand where their efforts have the highest leverage in influencing the paper's outcome.

This skill provides a comprehensive, year-round workflow guide for submitting research papers to the CoRL Conference on Robot Learning. It meticulously breaks down the annual cycle into manageable phases—including pre-submission preparation, managing reviewer feedback, crafting rebuttals, and preparing camera-ready versions. It assists teams in planning their efforts across critical milestones and navigating the academic publishing process.

A comprehensive guide on structuring responses to peer reviews for top-tier academic conferences (e.g., DAC, ICCAD). It provides strategies for writing rebuttals, transforming reviews into actionable fixes, and adapting the response style for both conference resubmission and journal formats, emphasizing evidence over argument.

This comprehensive guide outlines a detailed, backward-planning workflow for submitting research papers to major AI conferences like ECAI or IJCAI-ECAI. It covers the entire academic lifecycle, from initial topic selection and evidence type planning to abstract submission, full paper drafting, rebuttal response, and final camera-ready publication, ensuring authors meet strict deadlines and adhere to rigorous review standards.

A comprehensive strategic guide for authors responding to peer reviews at top-tier academic conferences. It teaches how to interpret reviews as a 'bin-sorting' problem, structure persuasive rebuttals, address specific technical objections (measurement, design), and convert vague revision conditions into a concrete, actionable resubmission contract and plan.