Skill UI

A comprehensive guide and fit test designed to help researchers assess whether their empirical psychology project meets the high standards of top-tier journals like Psychological Science. It evaluates key criteria including broad impact, statistical robustness, open science readiness (preregistration/data sharing), and adherence to strict format limits. Use this skill to pressure-test your idea before committing resources to data collection or analysis, guiding you toward the optimal manuscript type (e.g., Research Article vs. Registered Report).

This tool acts as an orchestrator for submitting manuscripts to Psychological Science. It guides researchers through the complex publication process, making critical decisions based on the manuscript type (e.g., Research Article, Registered Report) and the current stage of development. It is crucial for managing constraints like tight word limits and rigorous open-science requirements, directing users to the correct specialized skills at every step.

This tool serves as an essential orchestrator for crafting and submitting research syntheses (such as meta-analyses and systematic reviews) for Psychological Bulletin. It guides users through the entire rigorous research lifecycle—from initial topic selection and literature searching (PRISMA) to data coding, meta-analysis, theoretical integration, and final manuscript preparation. It ensures that the project is correctly framed as a synthesis of existing work, not a primary study.

This comprehensive checklist guides authors preparing theoretical manuscripts for submission to Psychological Review. It ensures meticulous adherence to APA 7th style, proper manuscript masking, accurate citation practices, and the correct presentation of computational model code, ensuring the paper meets the journal's stringent theory-focused scope.

A comprehensive preflight checklist for submitting academic manuscripts to Public Administration Review (PAR). It guides authors through mandatory final checks, including double-blind anonymization, adherence to strict word count limits (≤ 8,000 words), proper abstract length (≤ 150 words), APA formatting, and inclusion of Evidence for Practice points. Use this checklist before the final upload to avoid common formatting or procedural rejection reasons.

A comprehensive guide for authors to pinpoint the unique quantitative contribution (the 'delta') of their manuscript. It teaches how to articulate the specific gap closed relative to prior empirical, structural, and methodological work, ensuring the paper is correctly positioned for target journals like QE, distinguishing it from related fields.

This comprehensive guide serves as a preflight checklist for authors submitting manuscripts to academic journals, specifically targeting the Quantitative Economics (QE) journal. It details critical formatting rules, membership requirements, fee structures, and procedural best practices, ensuring authors perform a thorough self-review before final submission to minimize rejection risks.

This router guides authors through the complex publication lifecycle for Quantitative Economics (QE) submissions. It diagnoses current bottlenecks—whether in topic framing, data analysis, contribution clarity, or writing style—and directs the user to the precise specialized skill needed at that stage, ensuring a structured path from initial concept to final submission or rebuttal.

This router guides the author through the complex, multi-stage process of submitting a top-tier economics manuscript to the Quarterly Journal of Economics (QJE). It diagnoses the current bottleneck—whether it's conceptual framing, causal identification, robustness checks, or writing style—and directs the user to the appropriate specialized skill stage (e.g., literature positioning, identifying, rebuttal). It does not replace specialized skills but ensures optimal workflow sequencing.

This comprehensive preflight guide ensures authors meet all technical and procedural requirements before submitting to academic journals, specifically detailing the steps for the Review of Economic Dynamics (RED). It covers mandatory steps such as confirming submission fees, adhering to strict formatting rules (abstract length, citation style), preparing data archives (Option C), and navigating the journal's specific workflow (ScienceDirect/Editorial Manager). Following this checklist minimizes rejection risks due to formatting or procedural errors.

Guides authors through the rigorous, end-to-end lifecycle of submitting a paper to the Review of Economic Dynamics (RED). It acts as an orchestration checklist, covering critical stages from initial scope definition and quantitative modeling to data archiving, manuscript formatting, fee payment, and handling revisions. It ensures authors maintain methodological rigor and code-first discipline throughout the entire academic publishing process.

A comprehensive guide for drafting a structured, point-by-point rebuttal letter in response to major/minor research policy revisions. It teaches how to synthesize conflicting referee comments into a coherent plan, defend core innovation claims with evidence, and manage the handling editor's expectations, ensuring the original contribution is protected throughout the revision process.