Skill UI

This workflow transforms long YouTube talks and lectures into a personal, structured, and local markdown library. Each video becomes a self-contained file containing slide snapshots, full timestamped transcripts, and editable study notes. It eliminates reliance on cloud services, giving users full ownership of their academic material.

Specialized skill to rewrite and humanize AI-generated natural language files (like notes or documentation). It removes common 'AI-isms' such as sycophantic openings, stock vocabulary, over-explaining, and excessive signposting. Users can choose between a fast, deterministic regex cleanup or a deep LLM rewrite (default mode) using Claude to enhance burstiness and match a natural human voice, all while strictly preserving code blocks, URLs, and headings.

A structured template designed for comprehensive meeting minutes. It guides users to capture key elements including attendees, agenda items, major decisions, detailed action items (with owners and due dates), and next steps. Ideal for professional settings requiring clear follow-up and accountability.

This skill enforces rigorous meeting discipline through a four-stage workflow: Cost Gating, Timeboxed Agenda Building, Running the Meeting, and Action Item Extraction. It calculates meeting costs, ensures every agenda topic has a desired outcome, and converts raw notes into a structured, owner-assigned, due-dated checklist, flagging any missing owners or deadlines. Ideal for transforming unproductive meetings into actionable, accountable outcomes.

This skill guides the polishing and structural refinement of academic accounting manuscripts, specifically for Contemporary Accounting Research (CAR) journal submissions. It ensures the abstract is concise (≤300 words) and comprehensive, enforces front-loading of the research question and findings, and mandates strict consistency checks between constructs, proxies, and variables. It also ensures adherence to specific academic formatting rules, such as footnotes and author-date referencing.

A comprehensive guide designed to verify academic manuscripts against journal-specific guidelines (e.g., CEQ). It covers all critical aspects before submission, including citation style (author-date, not footnotes), abstract limits, keyword selection, JEL coding, document anonymity, and data reproducibility, ensuring a smooth submission process and minimizing formatting rejections.

This tool provides a comprehensive pre-submission checklist tailored for submitting manuscripts to high-tier academic journals. It verifies adherence to complex guidelines, covering manuscript length, abstract structure, citation formats (footnotes and real references), data reproducibility requirements, and double-blind anonymity protocols. It helps authors catch technical errors and formatting inconsistencies before official submission.

A comprehensive guide for researchers to pressure-test the academic fit of their project for top-tier criminology journals. It guides authors on moving beyond descriptive data analysis to achieve general theoretical contributions, differentiating between Articles and Research Notes, and ensuring the work advances core debates in the field of crime and deviance.

This skill guides users in polishing academic manuscripts for submission to The Journal of Politics (JOP). It emphasizes adhering to strict page constraints (pages, not words), maintaining general readability for non-specialists, and following the double-blind style guide. It helps trim excessive references, footnotes, and appendices to fit the required length while preserving the core argument.

This skill provides comprehensive guidance on adhering to PMLA (Publications of the Modern Language Association) style, utilizing the most recent MLA Handbook. It covers the mechanics of academic writing, including creating in-text parenthetical citations, building a Works Cited list from core elements, and correctly formatting quotations, translations, and discursive notes. Essential for final style checks before academic submission.

An expert orchestrator and routing guide for manuscripts submitted to the Population and Development Review (PDR). It helps users determine the appropriate specialization path, whether they are starting an idea, refining the theory, or finalizing the submission. It matches the content's lifecycle stage and article type (e.g., Research Article, Notes & Commentary) to the correct development pipeline, ensuring the deep connection between population dynamics and societal policy is maintained.

A comprehensive pre-submission checklist designed for academics submitting manuscripts to scholarly journals. It covers crucial formatting rules, such as specific citation styles (Author-Date), bibliography standards (GB/T 7714), appropriate use of footnotes, abstract/keyword length limits, and guidelines for maintaining anonymity during the review process. Essential for ensuring submissions meet strict academic publishing requirements.