Skill UI

Prepare and maintain venue-compliant rebuttals to external peer reviews. Parses reviewer feedback, ensures full issue coverage without fabrication, drafts safe text-only responses under character limits, and manages follow-up rounds for venues like ICML and OpenReview.

Assists authorized reviewers in preparing evidence-bounded, constructive peer-review drafts and structured manuscript assessments. Supports reporting-guideline selection, claim–evidence checks, methods, statistics, reproducibility, and ethics critique.

Simulates a five-seat international journal peer review panel with dynamic reviewer personas covering journal fit, methodology, domain expertise, cross-disciplinary views and devil's advocacy. Supports full review, re-review verification, quick assessment, methodology focus and reviewer calibration.

This skill orchestrates the complete academic research workflow from initial research to final publication. It coordinates deep research, paper writing, and review processes into a seamless 10-stage pipeline. It manages transitions, tracks state, and ensures integrity through mandatory checks and peer reviews. Suitable for end-to-end paper generation and research-to-publication workflows.

Provides a comprehensive guide for authors responding to peer reviewer feedback and revision comments for top-tier academic journals. It teaches structured rebuttal writing, handling disagreements while maintaining professionalism, and managing multi-round revisions to systematically increase publication probability.

A comprehensive preflight checklist designed for authors submitting high-level academic manuscripts (e.g., AMS-LaTeX articles). It guides users through verifying technical formatting, mathematical rigor, reference consistency, and logistical requirements before final portal submission. It ensures the manuscript is ready for peer review, focusing on structure and format, not scientific merit.

A comprehensive guide detailing the end-to-end workflow for submitting research papers to top-tier academic conferences, such as the ACM SIGOPS ATC. It provides a backward planning structure, covering critical stages from initial system freezing and extended abstract writing, through multi-round peer review, rebuttal preparation, artifact evaluation, and final camera-ready submission.

This skill systematizes the entire academic publishing journey for long-form papers, specifically targeting the requirements of top-tier journals like the Chinese Journal of Computers (CJC). It maps out the complete timeline from initial topic selection, through experimentation, writing, submission, multi-stage peer review, revision, and final publication, providing critical checkpoints and best practices to ensure a systematic and successful process.

This comprehensive checklist guides authors through the final, critical steps before submitting an academic manuscript to a peer-reviewed journal. It covers mandatory technical requirements, such as correctly separating figures (TIFF/EPS) from text (.doc/.rtf), adhering to specific style guides (e.g., Chicago author-date), confirming article type word counts, and addressing critical ethical statements and copyright assignments. Essential for ensuring smooth submission via platforms like Editorial Manager.

A comprehensive guide on structuring responses to peer reviews for top-tier academic conferences (e.g., DAC, ICCAD). It provides strategies for writing rebuttals, transforming reviews into actionable fixes, and adapting the response style for both conference resubmission and journal formats, emphasizing evidence over argument.

A comprehensive strategic guide for authors responding to peer reviews at top-tier academic conferences. It teaches how to interpret reviews as a 'bin-sorting' problem, structure persuasive rebuttals, address specific technical objections (measurement, design), and convert vague revision conditions into a concrete, actionable resubmission contract and plan.

This comprehensive guide details the rigorous double-blind peer review process at the European Sociological Review (ESR). It helps authors anticipate reviewer critiques on comparative design, quantitative modeling, and theoretical contribution, ensuring the manuscript is structured for success before submission.