Skill UI

This guide details how to hunt for adversary lateral movement (MITRE ATT&CK TA0008) using Splunk's advanced SPL querying capabilities. It focuses on analyzing Windows authentication logs (e.g., Type 3/10 logons), correlating event IDs (4624, 4648) with process creation data (Sysmon), and identifying unusual source-destination relationships across the network to scope the breadth of a compromise.

This skill facilitates the systematic triage and closure of open promises or commitments within a project context. It guides the user to reliably close these commitments using verifiable, real-world outcomes via the acc_act(runtime="outcome") command. It emphasizes maintaining rigorous provenance discipline, ensuring that status updates are based only on external or runtime validated results, thereby maximizing data integrity and accountability.

This comprehensive guide details the rigorous process of preparing a double-blind academic paper for its final, public, dual-published status across ACM and IEEE platforms. It systematically covers de-anonymization (restoring names, affiliations, and acknowledgments), ensuring all rebuttal promises are met within strict page limits, and managing complex metadata requirements (ORCID, CCS concepts, rights blocks). It serves as a final production checklist for authors.

A comprehensive checklist and guide for authors preparing their accepted research papers for final publication (camera-ready). This process involves de-anonymization, restoring full author details, updating copyright and metadata, ensuring formal formatting, and managing the release of promised artifacts and code for reproducibility.

A comprehensive guide for authors preparing accepted academic papers for publication in the ACM Digital Library. This process covers de-anonymization (restoring author details, funding, and public links), applying the strict double-column format, adhering to page budgets, incorporating all results promised during the rebuttal, and finalizing necessary metadata and conference artifacts.

A comprehensive guide for drafting a structured, double-blind academic rebuttal for conferences (like PerCom). This skill focuses on addressing explicit reviewer questions using only evidence already present in the submitted paper, thereby avoiding the promise of new experiments. It covers maintaining anonymity, structuring arguments, and focusing on core technical dimensions like cross-subject evaluation and metric soundness.