Skill UI

Acts as a collaborative writing partner, helping you build outlines, research with citations, improve hooks, and review each section so blogs, tutorials, thought leadership, and docs get polished without losing your voice.

An automated five-stage pipeline that turns a narrative research report into a polished, submission-ready LaTeX paper with compiled PDF: outline planning, figure generation, LaTeX writing, compilation, and two autonomous review-and-improvement rounds.

Deep research and scientific writing assistant that produces LaTeX/BibTeX documents with verified citations for papers, proposals, reports, and reviews, ensuring well-formatted, citation-backed outputs for academic or clinical contexts.

Draft a structured, reviewer-ready grant proposal from research ideas and literature. Supports KAKENHI, NSF, NSFC, ERC, DFG, SNSF, ARC and NWO formats, with narrative, aims, budget and timeline planning.

PIP kicks in when tasks fail repeatedly or the assistant becomes passive, layering Western big-tech performance rhetoric, a systematic debugging methodology, and proactivity enforcement so every code, ops, research, deployment, or writing task is owned, verified, and driven to completion.

Breaks complex software, writing, or research work into small atomic tasks, supplying dependency graphs, milestone breakdowns, and templates so you can plan projects, split features, and organize large workstreams step by step.

This skill orchestrates the complete academic research workflow from initial research to final publication. It coordinates deep research, paper writing, and review processes into a seamless 10-stage pipeline. It manages transitions, tracks state, and ensures integrity through mandatory checks and peer reviews. Suitable for end-to-end paper generation and research-to-publication workflows.

This tool acts as an orchestrator for academic manuscripts intended for the American Educational Research Journal (AERJ). It guides users through the entire writing lifecycle, determining the correct next step based on the current development stage and the paper's dominant education-research lens (e.g., policy, teaching, development). It is designed to ensure the contribution is pitched to the whole field, not just a subfield.

This comprehensive workflow acts as a systematic router for authors writing empirical management papers for the Academy of Management Journal (AMJ). It guides users through the entire research lifecycle—from initial topic selection and theory development, through rigorous methodology and data analysis, to refining writing style, and finally managing the submission and rebuttal process. It ensures the manuscript meets the high standards of theoretical and empirical contribution required by top-tier academic journals.

This tool acts as a diagnostic router for writing manuscripts intended for the Administrative Science Quarterly (ASQ). It does not write the content but guides the user through the entire research and publication cycle—from initial topic selection and theory development, through methodology, data analysis, and final submission/rebuttal. It diagnoses bottlenecks and suggests the next specialized skill to focus on.

A comprehensive guide for authors writing related work sections for top-tier systems conferences (e.g., ATC). It teaches how to accurately position a new system relative to existing literature, emphasizing delta-first comparisons, covering adjacent subareas, and adhering to strict double-blind citation protocols. Essential for academic rigor in systems research.

A comprehensive guide detailing the end-to-end workflow for submitting research papers to top-tier academic conferences, such as the ACM SIGOPS ATC. It provides a backward planning structure, covering critical stages from initial system freezing and extended abstract writing, through multi-round peer review, rebuttal preparation, artifact evaluation, and final camera-ready submission.