Skill UI

A comprehensive guide and checklist for preparing submissions for top-tier academic conferences, such as POPL. This resource helps researchers adhere to strict formatting rules (e.g., 25-page limits, acmsmall), maintain full double-blind anonymity, prevent unintentional author identity leaks, and manage the complex workflow and deadlines for academic publishing.

This tool acts as an orchestrator for manuscripts submitted to Public Opinion Quarterly (POQ). It guides authors through the entire academic writing lifecycle, determining the appropriate submission type (e.g., Original Article, Research Note) and routing them through the required methodological and structural stages, ensuring adherence to public opinion and survey standards.

This router guides researchers through the complex, multi-stage lifecycle of writing a broad, integrative, or theoretical 'perspective' article for high-impact journals like PoPS. It dictates the next necessary scholarly skill (e.g., literature synthesis, framework building, editor strategy, revision) based on the manuscript's current stage, helping authors transition from initial concept to final submission and revision.

This comprehensive guide serves as the final preflight checklist for submitting research to academic journals, specifically focusing on Psychological Science standards. It verifies adherence to strict requirements, including APA 7th edition formatting, specific word count limits, mandatory author anonymization, and rigorous open science compliance (e.g., depositing data, materials, and scripts with DOIs). Use this before final submission to ensure maximum compliance.

A comprehensive guide and fit test designed to help researchers assess whether their empirical psychology project meets the high standards of top-tier journals like Psychological Science. It evaluates key criteria including broad impact, statistical robustness, open science readiness (preregistration/data sharing), and adherence to strict format limits. Use this skill to pressure-test your idea before committing resources to data collection or analysis, guiding you toward the optimal manuscript type (e.g., Research Article vs. Registered Report).

This tool acts as an orchestrator for submitting manuscripts to Psychological Science. It guides researchers through the complex publication process, making critical decisions based on the manuscript type (e.g., Research Article, Registered Report) and the current stage of development. It is crucial for managing constraints like tight word limits and rigorous open-science requirements, directing users to the correct specialized skills at every step.

This tool serves as an essential orchestrator for crafting and submitting research syntheses (such as meta-analyses and systematic reviews) for Psychological Bulletin. It guides users through the entire rigorous research lifecycle—from initial topic selection and literature searching (PRISMA) to data coding, meta-analysis, theoretical integration, and final manuscript preparation. It ensures that the project is correctly framed as a synthesis of existing work, not a primary study.

A comprehensive guide for drafting a structured, point-by-point rebuttal letter in response to major/minor research policy revisions. It teaches how to synthesize conflicting referee comments into a coherent plan, defend core innovation claims with evidence, and manage the handling editor's expectations, ensuring the original contribution is protected throughout the revision process.

Provides a comprehensive preflight checklist for authors submitting manuscripts to Research Policy (RP) via the Elsevier online system. It guides authors through critical steps, including double-blind anonymization, confirming article scope (anchoring in innovation studies), selecting the correct article type (Full Article vs. Research Note), and ensuring all required declarations (data/code, funding) are included before final submission.

This router guides authors through the entire lifecycle of a manuscript targeting specialized academic journals like Research Policy (RP). It determines the optimal next step—whether it's refining the theory, developing methods, performing data analysis, structuring arguments, or responding to reviewer critiques (rebuttal). It ensures the paper maintains a strong focus on innovation studies and policy implications.

This workflow acts as a comprehensive router for academic researchers, guiding the entire manuscript lifecycle from initial topic selection and literature positioning through empirical identification, theoretical modeling, writing refinement, and final submission/rebuttal. It ensures the work adheres to the rigorous standards of top journals like The Review of Economic Studies (REStud).

This skill guides researchers through the rigorous process of refining a preliminary accounting idea into a sharp, contribution-driven research question suitable for top academic journals like Review of Accounting Studies (RAST). It helps users identify the core accounting construct, define the mechanism (friction/channel), and ensure the study's focus is on accounting theory, rather than merely using accounting data in a general finance context.