Skill UI

A structured system for creating persistent journals that track project context, progress, and next steps. This method ensures that work survives session boundaries, allowing users to easily pick up where they left off, whether starting a session or winding down a project. It mandates clear entries detailing what was accomplished, the current state, and the immediate next action.

This skill creates a standardized, persistent workspace (desk) for managing long-running projects or complex workstreams. It sets up a structured directory containing a detailed journal for historical context and a dedicated signals folder for structured data output, ensuring continuity across multiple sessions.

This comprehensive guide details the rigorous double-blind peer review process at the European Sociological Review (ESR). It helps authors anticipate reviewer critiques on comparative design, quantitative modeling, and theoretical contribution, ensuring the manuscript is structured for success before submission.

This guide provides a structured framework for drafting a scholarly rebuttal and response letter after receiving conditional acceptance or major revisions from a journal. It advises researchers on prioritizing editor feedback, strategically addressing referee comments (triage), sharpening the paper's general interest framing, and maintaining a professional, evidence-based tone. It emphasizes focusing on core credibility and impact rather than merely adding robustness tables.

This comprehensive guide provides a backward-planning workflow for submitting an Empirical Software Engineering (SE) paper to FSE. It manages the entire academic publication lifecycle, from initial venue confirmation and evidence lock to submission, major revision, and final presentation. It outlines critical milestones, deadlines, and potential failure modes to ensure a structured and successful academic publishing process.

This detailed project management skill provides a comprehensive, backward-planning guide for submitting to highly structured academic conferences, such as HPCA. It maps out critical milestones—from initial venue fit and evidence locking to review, revision, and final camera-ready submission—while identifying common failure modes and coordination requirements to maximize acceptance chances.

A comprehensive preflight checklist designed for submitting manuscripts to academic journals (e.g., Human Relations). It guides authors through critical pre-submission requirements, ensuring compliance with double-anonymity, strict word limits, SAGE Harvard citation style, structured abstracts, and mandatory declarations (AI use and data transparency). Use this tool to validate your manuscript before submission and minimize desk rejections.

This skill acts as a comprehensive router for developing academic manuscripts aimed at the International Economic Review (IER). It does not write the content but diagnoses the current bottleneck in the writing process. It guides the user through the entire rigorous workflow—from initial topic selection and theory modeling to empirical identification, robustness checks, and submission readiness—ensuring the paper is structured for maximum academic impact.

Provides a detailed and rigorous workflow guide for managing a full academic conference submission cycle (e.g., ISCA). It advises researchers on working backward from critical deadlines—from topic selection and baseline freezing to abstract writing, paper submission, handling reviews, and generating camera-ready artifacts—treating the academic process like a structured engineering schedule.

This skill acts as a comprehensive workflow router for authors preparing manuscripts for the Journal of Business Venturing (JBV). It does not write the content but guides the user through the necessary sequence of specialized skills—from initial topic selection and theory development, through data analysis, writing style refinement, to final submission and rebuttal planning. Use this when you need a structured plan for tackling a complex academic paper.

This skill orchestrates the complete manuscript lifecycle for submissions to the Journal of Corporate Finance (JCF). It guides users through all critical stages, including initial topic selection, establishing robust empirical identification strategies, rigorous data analysis, structured writing, and final submission and revision. It acts as a comprehensive process manager, ensuring all academic and procedural gates are cleared before submission.

This skill guides the generation of a professional and highly structured revision response package for top-tier academic journals. It specifically addresses multi-round, double-blind review processes, ensuring every reviewer comment is addressed point-by-point. The output includes a summary statement, a detailed response table, and the marked revision manuscript, all while adhering to strict rules against identity leakage, making it ideal for streamlining the academic publishing workflow.