Skill UI

This comprehensive preflight checklist is designed for authors submitting manuscripts to Global Change Biology (GCB) via ScholarOne. It ensures compliance with critical publisher requirements, helping authors avoid common desk-rejection reasons. The checklist verifies scope fit, adherence to word/abstract limits, the inclusion of mandatory graphical abstracts, and proper data availability statements (requiring DOIs).

This guide provides a comprehensive preflight checklist for authors submitting academic manuscripts to major journals (e.g., Wiley/Governance). It ensures compliance with critical submission requirements, including double-blind anonymization, strict word count limits, abstract length, Data Availability Statements, and adherence to specific scholarly scopes. Use this before hitting submit to minimize desk rejection risks and submission errors.

This comprehensive guide details the rigorous process of preparing a double-blind academic paper for its final, public, dual-published status across ACM and IEEE platforms. It systematically covers de-anonymization (restoring names, affiliations, and acknowledgments), ensuring all rebuttal promises are met within strict page limits, and managing complex metadata requirements (ORCID, CCS concepts, rights blocks). It serves as a final production checklist for authors.

A comprehensive preflight checklist designed for submitting manuscripts to academic journals (e.g., Human Relations). It guides authors through critical pre-submission requirements, ensuring compliance with double-anonymity, strict word limits, SAGE Harvard citation style, structured abstracts, and mandatory declarations (AI use and data transparency). Use this tool to validate your manuscript before submission and minimize desk rejections.

A comprehensive guide for authors submitting data-intensive systems papers to top-tier conferences (like ICDE). It details how to structure the paper, ensure technical claims are reconstructable, quantify all performance gains with associated costs, and compress complex ideas into a limited page budget while maintaining scholarly rigor.

This guide details the mandatory steps required after acceptance to prepare a paper for IEEE Xplore publication. It covers critical technical requirements, including full de-anonymization, adherence to the IEEEtran format and page limits, completing the electronic Copyright Form (eCF), passing PDF eXpress validation, and integrating reviewer feedback without scope creep.

A comprehensive guide for authors preparing accepted academic papers for final publication. It details the requirements for a dual-publisher format (ACM and IEEE), covering mandatory steps like de-anonymization, completing dual metadata (ORCID, CCS, DOI), integrating reviewer feedback without scope creep, and permanentizing dataset/firmware links using public DOI archives. This ensures the submission meets the highest standards for academic rigor and publishing platforms.

Provides detailed guidelines for authors submitting technical research papers, clarifying how to split content between the main 18-page body and supplementary artifacts. It stresses that all decision-critical evidence, such as threat models and core results, must reside within the reviewed body to ensure reviewers can adequately evaluate the work without relying on accessing supplemental materials.

A comprehensive checklist designed for authors submitting academic manuscripts to journals like JEBO via Elsevier Editorial Manager. It ensures compliance with strict formatting rules, including abstract length, keyword usage, JEL codes, author-date referencing, and mandatory declarations (COI, AI usage). This tool helps authors verify their submission package before final upload.

A comprehensive guide for authors submitting manuscripts to the Journal of Economic Growth (JEG). It details the specific expectations of specialized reviewers in dynamic macroeconomics, covering key areas like theoretical originality, empirical identification, and fit with long-run growth mechanisms. Use this guide to pre-emptively address potential weaknesses and structure revisions.

This router guides authors through the entire lifecycle of writing a manuscript targeting the Journal of Monetary Economics (JME). It acts as a structured workflow navigator, helping diagnose bottlenecks and determine the next critical step—from initial topic selection and literature positioning to data analysis, writing style refinement, and final rebuttal preparation. It is essential for maintaining consistency with high-level academic journal standards.

This guide teaches authors how to strategically position their research contribution for top-tier management journals. It emphasizes moving beyond simple 'gap-spotting' to 'problematization'—challenging existing assumptions within a focused academic conversation. It also provides detailed advice on how to differentiate the work from contributions appropriate for sibling journals (AMJ, SMJ, etc.), significantly boosting publication chances.