Skill UI

A comprehensive preflight checklist designed for authors submitting academic manuscripts to specialized journals. It guides users through verifying complex requirements, including formatting rules (double-spacing, font size), style compliance, data availability policies, and submission fee procedures, ensuring the paper is submission-ready and meets journal standards.

This skill guides researchers through the rigorous process of refining a preliminary accounting idea into a sharp, contribution-driven research question suitable for top academic journals like Review of Accounting Studies (RAST). It helps users identify the core accounting construct, define the mechanism (friction/channel), and ensure the study's focus is on accounting theory, rather than merely using accounting data in a general finance context.

This router guides the entire workflow for developing a high-quality academic manuscript targeting the Review of Accounting Studies (RAST). It helps users determine the next necessary step—be it theory development, data analysis, refining contributions, or preparing for submission and rebuttal—ensuring methodological rigor and structural completeness throughout the writing process.

A comprehensive checklist for preparing academic manuscripts for submission to major financial journals. It guides authors through formatting rules, ensuring double-blind anonymization, preparing the Internet Appendix, writing a detailed cover letter, and addressing mandatory code release conditions, ensuring readiness before final portal submission.

This guide acts as a comprehensive workflow router for developing manuscripts intended for The Review of Financial Studies (RFS). It diagnoses the current stage of the research process—from initial topic selection and literature positioning to empirical design, robustness checking, writing polish, and rebuttal. It does not replace specialized skills but directs the user to the precise skill needed next, ensuring novelty and rigor are maintained throughout the entire academic publishing cycle.

A comprehensive guide and checklist for submitting academic manuscripts to specific journals (like RJE) via online portals. This tool verifies adherence to strict submission requirements, including hard page caps (e.g., 40/50 pp), abstract word limits (<=100 words), required citation styles (Author-Date), file types (Word/LaTeX), and non-refundable fee considerations. It ensures authors are fully prepared before hitting the final submit button.

This comprehensive tool guides researchers in drafting rigorous, point-by-point responses to referee reports (R&R). It ensures that every comment is systematically addressed, classifying fixes and providing structured revisions. Critically, it mandates that all substantive fixes must be backed by real, reproducible re-runs, citing specific numbers generated via an execution bridge to maintain scientific rigor.

This tool acts as a comprehensive workflow router for manuscripts aiming for top-tier journals like Science. It doesn't write the content but guides the user through essential stages—from initial significance testing to final submission and rebuttal. It diagnoses bottlenecks and suggests the next specialized skill needed, ensuring the manuscript meets high standards for general interest and structure.

This comprehensive guide helps authors determine if their multidisciplinary scientific work is suitable for Science Advances, a major AAAS open-access journal. It details the journal's scope, required methodological rigor, house style, and submission checklist, helping authors re-frame and position their research for maximum impact within the AAAS family.

This guide provides a structured methodology for planning complex academic research publications, especially those governed by multi-deadline cycles. It emphasizes backward scheduling, accounting for non-compressible physical processes like hardware deployment and energy campaigns. It helps researchers sequence activities from initial topic selection through building, measurement, writing, and handling potential resubmission requirements across two distinct academic deadlines.

This tool acts as an orchestrator for academic manuscripts targeting general social-science journals. It guides authors through the entire writing and revision lifecycle, ensuring the paper maintains a general audience focus and adheres to strict structural constraints, such as 10,000-word limits (including references) and 10 figure/table panels. It routes the user to the most necessary next skill, whether for initial topic selection, theoretical positioning, research design, or final rebuttal.

This skill guides users through the complex, year-long project lifecycle required for submitting a paper to a top-tier academic conference like SIGCOMM. It outlines key milestones, from initial venue fit and evidence locking to abstract submission, review response, and final camera-ready artifact presentation, ensuring adherence to the single annual deadline.